Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Your reason for accepting evolution
Beretta
Member (Idle past 5627 days)
Posts: 422
From: South Africa
Joined: 10-29-2007


Message 103 of 111 (433130)
11-10-2007 9:39 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by Dr Adequate
11-06-2007 9:26 AM


Re: Tiktaalik
Of course your lies make sense to you.
Of course to call them lies indicates that you imagine that I am trying to deceive you -I could call your conclusions lies except that I know you believe yourself so I wouldn't need to be arrogant about it. I would prefer to say 'your interpretations' knowing that you are not attempting to deceive -you are merely deceived and passing it on. I haven't actually met an evolutionist yet that I feel is knowingly trying to make me believe a lie yet it seems practically every evolutionist on this site prefers to call my interpretations lies as if they really can't believe I could possibly be sincere.
You are telling me lies about what I think
No, I'm telling you that all your beliefs are built on your belief that evolution happened in the first place.
which is why you can present no evidence for this ridiculous falsehood
Well how about dinosaurs -aka dragons -mentioned in history books so no possibility that man did not see them since they drew them, decorated buildings with them etc etc. showing that accordingly,the geologic time scale of 135 -65 million years would render them extinct tens of millions of years before humans existed which is clearly not possible. I would say that the geologic time scale definately doesn't work - but then man invented the geologic time scale according to the assumption that evolution happened.
Which intermediate forms do you claim have gone "into the garbage"?
A whole bunch of former 'icons' have been determined to not be icons after all but rather incorrect interpretations of the evidence based on wishful thinking by evolutionists that believe in evolution and then look for some evidence that fits.Piltdown man was used as an icon for 40 years before it was determined to be a fraud. Neanderthals are men with diseases. Nebraska man was an imaginary transition all built on one tooth and lots of artistic licence. Evolutionists don't ask themselves whether man evolved from apes they ask which apes did they evolve from. That is their starting point, that assumption -if I were a paleontologist and assumed that connection, perhaps I could find a missing link too. My imagination would be sure to assist me.
If you were motivated by a desire for truth, you'd have spent some time trying to find out if any of the nonsense you're reciting was in fact true.
Perhaps I have but for now I'm more worried about you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-06-2007 9:26 AM Dr Adequate has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-11-2007 10:22 AM Beretta has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024