Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   So What is Blasphemy?
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 1 of 28 (425033)
09-30-2007 4:01 AM


In the thread Message 218 CTD states:
quote:
For example, you've been informed that jar is a 'christian'. EvC has its own definition, and Ringo is also a 'christian' by EvC standards.
Now read through this thread, and decide for yourself if anyone else would apply the term to them.
quote:
I shan't post highlights. It speaks for itself. Or rather, they speak for themselves.
I believe that CTD has clearly implied that he is the judge of who should be called Christian and who should not. I disagree as I believe that it is up to the individual to define for themselves what they believe.
In post Message 218 CTD states:
quote:
When did I act as judge, jury, and executioner? I merely invited readers to observe that in order to apply the term 'christian' to persons who make posts of this type, one needs a peculiar definition of the term. Most peculiar. Where is the judging, jurying, & executing in that?
And I care not for any new definitions of 'blasphemy' you may care to offer. I'd have no choice but to conclude you'd use it about as accurately as you use other terms.
My admittedly limited understanding indicates that the term blasphemy is not so much about saying 'dog gone' as certain overzealous fanatics presuming to speak for God and saying who is saved and who is damned. While this may be a bit of a stretch in this particular case, it does appear that CTD is just short of presuming to speak for God.
So is blasphemy about cussing, whatever that may mean, or it it presuming to speak for God?
I guess Bible forum.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Brian, posted 09-30-2007 7:22 AM anglagard has not replied
 Message 5 by Omnivorous, posted 09-30-2007 8:53 PM anglagard has not replied
 Message 8 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-01-2007 8:05 AM anglagard has not replied

  
AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 28 (425036)
09-30-2007 4:30 AM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 3 of 28 (425060)
09-30-2007 7:22 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by anglagard
09-30-2007 4:01 AM


So is blasphemy about cussing, whatever that may mean, or it it presuming to speak for God?
It could include both, depending on the situation.
Essentially, blasphemy is to speak impiously about God. So it is not blasphemous to say "f*ck" when you hit your thumb with a hammer.
I believe that to say "Jesus f*kin Christ" when you hit your thumb with a hammer is not blasphemous because of the context.
To be blasphemous you really have to mean in your heart what it is you say about God.
It would also depend on your faith as well. If I said that Jesus was a filthy conman who ripped people off, then in a xian context that would be blasphemous, but it wouldnt be blasphemous in a Jewish or Muslim context as neither of these faiths accept Jesus as divine, although Muslims may be pissed off at one of their prophets being spoken about like that.
So, blasphemy is about intentionally saying derogatory things about God.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by anglagard, posted 09-30-2007 4:01 AM anglagard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 09-30-2007 6:29 PM Brian has replied

  
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3077 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 4 of 28 (425144)
09-30-2007 6:29 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Brian
09-30-2007 7:22 AM


It would also depend on your faith as well. If I said that Jesus was a filthy conman who ripped people off, then in a xian context that would be blasphemous, but it wouldnt be blasphemous in a Jewish or Muslim context as neither of these faiths accept Jesus as divine, although Muslims may be pissed off at one of their prophets being spoken about like that.
So, blasphemy is about intentionally saying derogatory things about God.
Not exactly true.
Blasphemy is, precisely: denying what you knew in fact to be true, then saying it is not true.
Example: the Pharisees admitted that no person could do the works of Jesus (= miracles) unless God was with Him. THEN, later on, they said He did the works/miracles by the power of Beelzebub (= Satan). In this precise context Jesus called this blasphemy and said that it would not be forgiven. That is blasphemy - there you have it.
In 70 AD Titus executed the judgement of God.
Ray

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Brian, posted 09-30-2007 7:22 AM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Omnivorous, posted 09-30-2007 9:01 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied
 Message 7 by iceage, posted 09-30-2007 11:54 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied
 Message 10 by Brian, posted 10-01-2007 1:43 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 5 of 28 (425157)
09-30-2007 8:53 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by anglagard
09-30-2007 4:01 AM


Blasphemy, Heresy, and Insanity
Ahem.
Most importantly, Blasphemy is a Weyerbacher ale aged in oak bourbon barrels. It picks up gentle vanilla oak notes in a hazy orange beer with a medium beige head. The aroma is of yeast, fruit, bourbon, wood and alcohol...the taste, light sweet, with medium to full body and a sweet warming finish.
It is interesting and damn good!
Weyerbacher ales are also available in Heresy and Insanity bottlings.
All three are highly recommended.

Real things always push back.
-William James
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by anglagard, posted 09-30-2007 4:01 AM anglagard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-01-2007 11:50 AM Omnivorous has replied
 Message 16 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-02-2007 1:16 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 6 of 28 (425158)
09-30-2007 9:01 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Cold Foreign Object
09-30-2007 6:29 PM


Ray writes:
Blasphemy is, precisely: denying what you knew in fact to be true, then saying it is not true.
So blasphemy is basically a Republican sin?
The dictionary tells us that blasphemy is 1a) the act of insulting or showing contempt for God; 1b) the act of claiming the attributes of deity; 2) irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable.
Could you tell us the source of your special definition that no one else uses?

Real things always push back.
-William James
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 09-30-2007 6:29 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-02-2007 1:05 PM Omnivorous has replied
 Message 24 by anglagard, posted 10-05-2007 3:05 AM Omnivorous has not replied
 Message 25 by ringo, posted 10-05-2007 12:18 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 7 of 28 (425176)
09-30-2007 11:54 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Cold Foreign Object
09-30-2007 6:29 PM


Denying Truth equals Blasphemy
CFO writes:
Blasphemy is, precisely: denying what you knew in fact to be true, then saying it is not true.
This is really really a great definition!
Those who hang onto to antiquated religious notions even though their God given reasoning and observational powers would indicate otherwise are guilty of Blasphemy. Denying the truth is Blasphemy, self-deceit is Blasphemy, promoting lies and falsehoods are heresy.
Especially considering that many acquire or hold on to religious ideas for purely self-centric motivations such as; fulfilling a primal desires to extend the ego forever, bolstering a poor sense of self-esteem by providing a framework to condemn or belittle others, or as a means to achieve prestige or political power within a peer group.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 09-30-2007 6:29 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3627 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 8 of 28 (425199)
10-01-2007 8:05 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by anglagard
09-30-2007 4:01 AM


The Universal Language
Blasphemy is a Canadian metal band formed in 1984. The ensemble is known for its soaring display of lyricism, nuanced touch of panache, and compelling sense of elan.

Virtuosi currently affiliated with Blasphemy include:

Vocals: Nocturnal Grave Desecrator And Black Winds
Bass: Bestial Saviour Of The Undead Legions
Guitar: Caller Of The Storms*
Guitar: Deathlord Of Abomination And War Apocalypse
Drum: Three Black Hearts Of Damnation And Impurity

Artists affiliated with this ensemble in the past include:

Bass: Ace Gestapo, Necrosleezer, And Vaginal Commands
Guitar: Black Priest Of 7 Satanic Rituals
Guitar: The Traditional Sodomizer Of The Goddess Of Perversity
(* this artist reportedly uses a stage name)
Source: Blasphemy - Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives
____
Edited by Archer Opterix, : corrected misspelling of 'Necrosleezer.'

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by anglagard, posted 09-30-2007 4:01 AM anglagard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-02-2007 1:11 PM Archer Opteryx has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 9 of 28 (425218)
10-01-2007 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Omnivorous
09-30-2007 8:53 PM


Re: Blasphemy, Heresy, and Insanity
that sounds amazing. you will send me some as a wedding present, no?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Omnivorous, posted 09-30-2007 8:53 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Omnivorous, posted 10-01-2007 7:34 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 10 of 28 (425244)
10-01-2007 1:43 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Cold Foreign Object
09-30-2007 6:29 PM


Blasphemy is, precisely: denying what you knew in fact to be true, then saying it is not true.
This would only be blasphemous if it is related to God.
Example: the Pharisees admitted that no person could do the works of Jesus (= miracles) unless God was with Him. THEN, later on, they said He did the works/miracles by the power of Beelzebub (= Satan).
The Pharisees did not blaspheme because Jesus wasn’t God, they knew he was a crook, so they did not intentionally insult God.
In this precise context Jesus called this blasphemy and said that it would not be forgiven.
Of course Jesus is the expert in blasphemy.
That is blasphemy - there you have it.
As I said, it depends on which faith you are approaching from. From a Xian viewpoint your example may well be taken as blasphemous, but from a Jewish viewpoint there was no blasphemy in your example. The Pharisees did not insult God, because reading the Bible with even the slightest hint of objectivity demonstrates that Jesus was no God, and certainly no Messiah.
In 70 AD Titus executed the judgement of God.
You mean that Titus punished the Romans for killing Jesus?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 09-30-2007 6:29 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 10-02-2007 12:59 PM Brian has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 11 of 28 (425328)
10-01-2007 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by macaroniandcheese
10-01-2007 11:50 AM


Re: Blasphemy, Heresy, and Insanity
brenna writes:
that sounds amazing. you will send me some as a wedding present, no?
Well, at least some Blasphemy, which I have sampled locally.
Besides, you seem to have the Heresy and Insanity covered.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-01-2007 11:50 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by macaroniandcheese, posted 10-01-2007 8:47 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 12 of 28 (425337)
10-01-2007 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Omnivorous
10-01-2007 7:34 PM


Re: Blasphemy, Heresy, and Insanity
i agree.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Omnivorous, posted 10-01-2007 7:34 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3077 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 13 of 28 (425482)
10-02-2007 12:59 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Brian
10-01-2007 1:43 PM


This would only be blasphemous if it is related to God.
Yes, that was the context of my points.
The Pharisees did not blaspheme because Jesus wasn’t God, they knew he was a crook, so they did not intentionally insult God.
There are verses that have them admitting that He could not do the miracles that He did unless God was with Him. THEN there are verses that have them saying He did said miracles by the power of Beelzebub. In this context Jesus called this unforgiveable blasphemy.
You mean that Titus punished the Romans for killing Jesus?
My point can only be understood by persons who have at least a basic knowledge of ancient history. Titus destroyed Jerusalem, not Rome.
Ray

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Brian, posted 10-01-2007 1:43 PM Brian has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Brian, posted 10-02-2007 2:21 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3077 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 14 of 28 (425484)
10-02-2007 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Omnivorous
09-30-2007 9:01 PM


Omni writes:
Could you tell us the source of your special definition that no one else uses?
Ray writes:
http://EvC Forum: So What is Blasphemy? -->EvC Forum: So What is Blasphemy?
"Example: the Pharisees admitted that no person could do the works of Jesus (= miracles) unless God was with Him. THEN, later on, they said He did the works/miracles by the power of Beelzebub (= Satan). In this precise context Jesus called this blasphemy and said that it would not be forgiven. That is blasphemy - there you have it."
Ray
Edited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Omnivorous, posted 09-30-2007 9:01 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Omnivorous, posted 10-02-2007 2:44 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

  
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3077 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 15 of 28 (425485)
10-02-2007 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Archer Opteryx
10-01-2007 8:05 AM


Off Topic Derail, deserves suspension
The post I am responding to is egregiously off topic and a deliberate derail.
If I was a Moderator I would suspend you for one day.
Ray
Edited by Cold Foreign Object, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-01-2007 8:05 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by kuresu, posted 10-02-2007 1:17 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied
 Message 23 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-03-2007 11:26 AM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024