Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 13.0
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 11 of 312 (424827)
09-28-2007 8:25 PM


Jar
there is no logical or rational defense for creationism. this is repeatedly proven on this site. creationism is based solely on arguments of emotion from authority period. since buz can't deal with this blatant reality, he decided to shut jar up.
abuse of power 3.0.

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 09-28-2007 9:20 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 13 of 312 (424835)
09-28-2007 9:44 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by AdminBuzsaw
09-28-2007 9:20 PM


Re: Jar
are you aware that it was Admin who administered the suspension on Jar and not AdminBuz?
no, because it wasn't posted in the suspensions and bannings thread.
no such claim relative to the Biblicalist creationist constituency at large has been proven on this site.
maybe you're right. but it doesn't have to be. it's an argument based on authority. it's from a book that claims to be the word of god. argument from authority, period.
How about specifying why you think my action was an abuse of power.
you used the word lie. i think that's a bit strong for moderator action, no? i'd wager you decided to add a little of your own authority to your whine against jar because you can't accept the fact that your beliefs are based on a book and nothing else. regardless of the truth of that book, there is not a rational or logical argument to be made, rather only the "god said it; i believe it" argument.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 09-28-2007 9:20 PM AdminBuzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 09-28-2007 10:40 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 17 of 312 (424844)
09-28-2007 11:02 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by AdminBuzsaw
09-28-2007 10:40 PM


Re: Jar
This has been the case for quite some time now.
that's nice. where is this amazing information stored so that we may know it instead of having you hover it over our heads like some delicious pavlovian treat?
Thus there is no longer a necessity of informing regarding suspensions in separate thread by moderators as I understand it.
except, you know, public record.
I'm right and that not all Biblicalist creationists debate on emotion alone as the statement clearly implied.
they do so disingenuously.
Thus the rare usage of the "L" word which I rarely ever apply to anyone.
rare or not, it's against forum rules.
I don't see how this can be brushed off as a mistake when it was quite obviously a deliberate lie, given the messenger knew full well that it was a meanspirited falsehood aimed at Biblical creationists.
no, it isn't.
1. I would appreciate it if you would stop describing my action as whining when in fact it was Admin himself who obviously agreed with it by his action and his reason for the action.
that's nice. i'm sure it's not the first time percy's been wrong.
I have learned to be thick skinned here
**if you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all...**
but you have admitted that perhaps I was right
omg!! i said maybe. omg you're so right i'm an idiot wtf?
you're amazing. really.
and I think you are being quite disrespectful and disingenuous
that's nice. but then you've never really demonstrated anything i think deserves respect.
not to mention that you are by doing so implicating Admin as a whiner as well
no. you used your admin mode to call a poster a liar. i'm calling you a whiner because it was a personal protest and one in violation of forum guidelines.
Just like Jar, you are lumping all of the Biblical creationist input here at EvC in one lump
um, what? i said you're being inappropriate. i also said that christianity takes it's direction and information and authority from the bible. therefore the only argument christians can make about the religion are from authority and NOTHING ELSE. if you can't comprehend that, then i'm sorry.
A number of Biblical creationists over the years including myself have applied a whole lot more to many debates than simply god did it, emotion and Biblical authority.
they've done so inappropriately.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 09-28-2007 10:40 PM AdminBuzsaw has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 26 of 312 (424935)
09-29-2007 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by Admin
09-29-2007 6:53 AM


Re: Clarification on Jar
Both creationists and evolutionists should treat the other side as the honest and respected opposition, not as hysterics, or any number of other provocative labels we often see coming from members, such as naive, delusional, liar, etc.
you mean like..
To perpetrate this lie
i think he means perpetuate, but in either case...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Admin, posted 09-29-2007 6:53 AM Admin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 09-29-2007 8:51 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 35 of 312 (424997)
09-29-2007 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by AdminBuzsaw
09-29-2007 8:51 PM


Re: Clarification on Jar
i don't really care if i'm right or not. what i care about is that you were debating in admin mode and still are. period.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 09-29-2007 8:51 PM AdminBuzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Omnivorous, posted 09-29-2007 11:13 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied
 Message 37 by Buzsaw, posted 09-30-2007 12:37 AM macaroniandcheese has replied
 Message 39 by anglagard, posted 09-30-2007 2:25 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied
 Message 44 by ringo, posted 09-30-2007 11:58 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied
 Message 45 by Trixie, posted 09-30-2007 4:19 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 38 of 312 (425017)
09-30-2007 12:51 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Buzsaw
09-30-2007 12:37 AM


Re: Clarification on Jar
You addressed my admin action and about all of what I've said to you was pertaing to that action.
which you've responded to with debate and side-stepping and neener-neener i'm an admin!!
Being a creationist moderator appears to require a lot of detailed explanation for folks
you've given no such explanation, and instead have continued to debate the question of whether or not creationists get all their source material from the bible or not.
I work to serve the board.
*cough*
Now that you've ran outa gas on being right
oh look. more neener-neener. congratulations. you argue bullshit archeology that's been proven crap for decades. your source is still a text and authority. period.
if that's all you have left
if that's all i have left?!?!
you're debating in admin mode! what the fuck is wrong with you that you don't see a problem with that?! what the fuck is wrong with every admin on this board that no one sees a problem with that!?!?!
jesus horsefucking christ on a stick. you people make me sick.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Buzsaw, posted 09-30-2007 12:37 AM Buzsaw has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 42 of 312 (425079)
09-30-2007 10:18 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by Buzsaw
09-30-2007 10:14 AM


Re: Clarification on Jar
It's not for me to take any action here, but Brennakimi is borderline on violation of the rules and becoming a disgrace to the board by the hate-speak she's spewing, imo.
and you're debating in a moderation thread.
i'm spewing no hate-speak. i'm cursing. there's a difference. just because your preciousssss is referenced doesn't make it hate-speak. now stop debating in a moderation thread, stop threatening admin action based on personal dislike, and don't ever debate again in admin mode.
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Buzsaw, posted 09-30-2007 10:14 AM Buzsaw has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 77 of 312 (425430)
10-02-2007 10:11 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by Taz
10-01-2007 6:11 PM


I was under the impression that this was not really about jar being suspended as *he* doesn't care, but rather about the behavior of adminbuz in regards to suspension-related or non-suspension-related moderator action. the conversation about faith is quite separate and prior to this action. you may be confused, however, because jar happens to be one of the most vocal of faith's supporters and that his suspension was as a result of comments made in discussing her potential restoration.
however, i will reiterate. the discussion has not centered on percy's flawed actions in suspending jar, or really on anything to do with faith, but rather on adminbuz' debating while in admin mode among other indiscretions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Taz, posted 10-01-2007 6:11 PM Taz has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 91 of 312 (425689)
10-03-2007 7:10 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by iano
10-03-2007 6:10 PM


Re: Clarification on Jar
you are aware of the title of this thread?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by iano, posted 10-03-2007 6:10 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by iano, posted 10-03-2007 7:14 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 111 of 312 (425995)
10-04-2007 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by Brian
10-04-2007 4:42 PM


Re: EvC becomes more of a joke
Do American drunk drivers get banned from driving or suspended from driving?
depends what state you live in.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by Brian, posted 10-04-2007 4:42 PM Brian has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Percy, posted 10-04-2007 6:19 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 115 of 312 (426007)
10-04-2007 6:44 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by Percy
10-04-2007 6:19 PM


Re: EvC becomes more of a joke
in florida, you lose it for 6 months or a year (not sure). apparently, in california, they buy you gas.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by Percy, posted 10-04-2007 6:19 PM Percy has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 121 of 312 (426060)
10-04-2007 10:07 PM


oh look, an on-topic post.
personal attacks
another wisecrack on my style, which--in case i need to mention--has been approved by the administration, and blatant name-calling.

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Omnivorous, posted 10-04-2007 11:04 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 128 of 312 (426116)
10-05-2007 9:29 AM
Reply to: Message 122 by Omnivorous
10-04-2007 11:04 PM


Re: oh look, an on-topic post.
i doubt that. i'm another fake, devil-worshipping "christian".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Omnivorous, posted 10-04-2007 11:04 PM Omnivorous has not replied

macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3928 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 269 of 312 (441991)
12-19-2007 2:35 PM
Reply to: Message 268 by RAZD
12-19-2007 2:30 PM


Re: Re-open with topic statement
is there a reason that had to be so blinding? a simple qs would have been sufficient.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by RAZD, posted 12-19-2007 2:30 PM RAZD has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024