Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Wegener and Evidence for Continental Drift
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 27 of 189 (36460)
04-07-2003 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Randy
04-07-2003 10:32 PM


Re: Steamed Ark Soup Redux
TC, you may return to your seat now.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Randy, posted 04-07-2003 10:32 PM Randy has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 82 of 189 (42102)
06-04-2003 5:34 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by TrueCreation
06-04-2003 4:27 PM


Ice rafting, authigenic sediments are irrelevant because they are highly localized
I don't think "ice rafted" and "authigenic" are supposed to go that close together.
Your comments, please, TC, on this abstract (one of perhaps a few hundred similar available on the web):
We have examined the record of sediment input during the last 140000 years in a deep-sea core from 4927'N, 2216'W in the eastern North Atlantic. Using uranium-series disequilibria to constrain time, we have calculated mass fluxes of total sediment, as well as mass and particle fluxes of major sedimentary components. Sediment accumulation rates were generally lower and relatively constant during broadly defined interglacial intervals, driven primarily by the burial of biogenic material. Accumulation rates were higher and more variable during glacial intervals, and were influenced primarily by terrigenous material. Peaks in bulk mass fluxes were associated with particular episodes (Heinrich events) within the last glacial and during each of the last two deglaciations. The flux of ice-rafted debris, as uniquely identified by coarse detrital fragments, was higher during layers representing each of the glacial Heinrich events, with modest increases during events H3 and H6, and dramatic increases during the others, confirming the widespread interpretation of these layers as episodes of enhanced iceberg delivery. The burial flux of foraminifera was markedly lower during each of the glacial Heinrich events, also confirming the original identification of these layers as barren intervals. Ice-rafting events within marine isotope stage 5 left neither a large detrital nor biogenic flux imprint at our study site. Variations in the burial rates of non-carbonate sediments were largely responsible for overall changes in sediment accumulation throughout the last climate cycle. Ice-rafting was apparently an important delivery mechanism for this terrigenous material. The instantaneous chronometer established here for the last 140000 years in the subpolar North Atlantic allows the transformation of existing and subsequent data from relative values to absolute burial fluxes.
McManus, et al., Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Volume 155, Issues 1-2 , 15 February 1998, Pages 29-43

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by TrueCreation, posted 06-04-2003 4:27 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 90 by TrueCreation, posted 06-04-2003 6:55 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 112 of 189 (42462)
06-09-2003 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by John
06-09-2003 5:28 PM


Nah, all those reversals were during the year Noah was floating around - good thing he didn't have a compass, or he would have been confused.
I did have a creationist tell me once that there were no magnetic reversals, because "there's no place on Earth where a compass points south." That statement is not only untrue (try the Canadian Arctic) but also has nothing to do with the "fossil" magnetism in crustal rocks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by John, posted 06-09-2003 5:28 PM John has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 141 of 189 (43801)
06-23-2003 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by TrueCreation
06-23-2003 5:34 PM


"You have to think that those sea-faring folk would have noticed. The Chinese were using compasses, or compass precursors, 1800 years ago. Surely that is plenty of time for quite a few reversals."
--Not if they all occured during the catastrophe. See Coragyps post 112.
Errm, TC? Have you heard of sarcasm?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by TrueCreation, posted 06-23-2003 5:34 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 142 by TrueCreation, posted 06-23-2003 7:00 PM Coragyps has not replied
 Message 143 by TrueCreation, posted 06-23-2003 7:00 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 184 of 189 (46381)
07-17-2003 6:42 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by TrueCreation
07-17-2003 2:43 PM


The cooling problem is a topic if scientific research all on its own, so what are you talking about?
I would guess that 'the cooling problem' - cooling down a 3000-km thick slab of mantle enough to raise its viscosity a millionfold and stop the madness of 'runaway plate tectonics' in a year or two - need not be a topic of its own. I would think that about two equations on a blackboard somewhere dealing with heat conduction in rock would put that "problem" to bed. Maybe one equation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by TrueCreation, posted 07-17-2003 2:43 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024