Hoot,
What is your problem?
I have given two very simple very clear criteria for both your initial OP and your new one. they have been massively minimalist, the deletion of 2 words or the deletion of 1 sentence. If you want to do what would please me why are you incapable of reading plain English and just doing what I told you would please me and would make the topic promotable?
All you had to do was take out the sentence where you made a claim for what the researchers theory was which was absolutely
not supported by what was in the article you referenced. Instead you wrote another whole OP. In what way was that easier than simply doing what I asked?
And now you still haven't taken out the 'OP' bits I objected to, I agree that in the absence of an alternative OP they aren't
as confusing but the fact that you chose to completely replace your original OP instead of doing what I actually asked you to and just removing the 2 instances of 'OP' in the post strikes me as a product of sheer bloodymindedness.
There are better thread ideas.
I agree, your first OP was much a better thread idea apart from the one sentence where you were misinterpreting the whole theory.
If you just don't want to take any admin direction let me know and I can close the thread down, otherwise if you want your topics promoted read what is said and do what we ask.
TTFN,
AW