But all the references that I can find now seem to indicate that Archaeopteryx was discovered first, and Huxley then used Archaeopteryx to propose the dinosaur ancestry of birds.
Yes but references abound in evolutionist literature (like Mayr), and on creationist sites that say archy is a fake (ie - made to look like the prediction).
More explicitly:
Huxley argued that birds and reptiles were descended from common ancestors. Decades later, Huxley's ideas fell out of favor. The recent discovery of many feathered dinosaurs has proven Huxley to have been right.
That's another prediction come true.
Enjoy.
Join the effort to unravel AIDS/HIV, unfold Proteomes, fight Cancer,
compare Fiocruz Genome and fight Muscular Dystrophy with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.