[QUOTE]
Keep in mind these are origin narratives.[QUOTE]
No, it is only a scientific theory. You seem to want to call it something it isn't, and give it attributions it lacks.
quote:
This is how it will go. At some point in the future, Human beings figure out how to artificial produce worm wholes. They use them to travel in time. One period of interest was the Cambrian explosion for the possible descent with modification implications (I hope we will know enough by this time that people will not still be claiming that this theory alone explains the origin of all life on this planet). A few of the time travelling scientist got killed and fossilized during their exploration. Thus, this is why we have human fossils and no prehuman forms.
I think you're just
ever so slightly short of a full orbit with this one.
Here, I can toss out slimy scifi and fundamentally useless "arguments" just as easily.
The wormhole device creates gravity waves that travel backward through time until they hit the edge of the universe (a giant piece of glass the Terrarium Keepers use to watch us through) where they are redshifted gravity field around the glass into microwaves, forming the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.
And Cygnus X-1 is an alien toilet. More on that later...if you throw out any more ridiculous "scenarios".
The first is the human fossil are false or the result of an accident in the lab.
These conclusions can both be ruled out if the results are repeatable. Remember, repeatability is important in science.
Scientist can pull these origin stories out of thin air.
No they can't, science requires repeatability, fulfilled predictions, and evidence. If those human skeletons in the Pre-Cambrian looked like Neanderthals I don't think they are likely to be from the future. If they were from the future, they should have technology with them. Your ridiculous scifi argument makes predictions that would easily confirm or falsify it.
All these stories sound quite correct.
I doubt anyone else agrees.
You can always shape the story to account for contradictory or a lack of evidence
That's not science. If you haven't noticed, you are trying so hard to argue against descent that you are actually accusing science of a conspiracy, either occuring now, or whenever falsifications occur.
This is the exact same tactic used by scholarly researchers involved in alien abduction studies, cattle mutilation, the hollow Earth, the Apollo-was-a-hoax theorists, and so on. Your logic that science will hide whatever it wants is unfalisifiable. Unlike common descent.