Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,422 Year: 3,679/9,624 Month: 550/974 Week: 163/276 Day: 3/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   August 2007 POTM
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3985
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 7.2


Message 16 of 25 (417147)
08-19-2007 5:57 PM


Author: RAZD
Forum: Biological Evolution
Thread: Dr. Schwartz' "MIssing Links"
Msg #: EvC Forum: Dr. Schwartz' "MIssing Links"
Brilliant echolalia--very meta
quote:
Do humans have to have them twice then? have them twice then?
Mortal threats be damned: RAZD is still Da Man, both in substance and style.

Real things always push back.
-William James
Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!
---------------------------------------

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 17 of 25 (417941)
08-25-2007 12:40 PM


Hoot Mon
Hoot Mon is crisp and clear and offers a view that is different from others.
I admit to nominating this one because I agree with him and because I haven't often agreed .
Oops
ABE
Message 18
Edited by NosyNed, : left out the darned message I was nominating

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-25-2007 4:12 PM NosyNed has replied

iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5936 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 18 of 25 (417946)
08-25-2007 1:02 PM


Archer Opterix's essay on Buddhism
Archer once again scores with clarity and conciseness.
Archer does a great job explaining the Buddhist and Taoist perspective concerning the ultimate reality and no-thing.
http://EvC Forum: Deism in the Dock -->EvC Forum: Deism in the Dock
I particularly like his frustration with the inadequacy of the various labels of religious affiliation (atheist, agnostic, theist, deist, etc.). I also find that my own continuously evolving views are not contained or wholly adverse to any of these classifications.
Thanks Archer for sharing you insight.

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 19 of 25 (417963)
08-25-2007 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by NosyNed
08-25-2007 12:40 PM


Re: Hoot Mon
What topic/message?
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by NosyNed, posted 08-25-2007 12:40 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by NosyNed, posted 08-25-2007 4:37 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 20 of 25 (417964)
08-25-2007 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Adminnemooseus
08-25-2007 4:12 PM


Hoot Mon's Msg
Added it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Adminnemooseus, posted 08-25-2007 4:12 PM Adminnemooseus has not replied

anglagard
Member (Idle past 858 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 21 of 25 (418052)
08-26-2007 3:25 AM


iceage in Great Debate
Author: iceage
Forum: The Great Debate
Thread: Biblical Coherency (Rob and Iceage Only)
MSG #: EvC Forum: Biblical Coherency (Rob and Iceage Only)
Rob writes:
It is up to us to take responsibility, and sometimes wipe out whole communities to keep the 'total organism' within our control.
quote:
Yikes! glad the Christian theist are no longer in control.
Those who blasphemously worship the bible itself and their "faith" requires that the Bible be considered as a whole divinely inspired work of the creator, this specific ethical contradiction is the best antidote to that notion. Other contradictions like Matthew misquoting and misreferencing the OT and gemological errors are trivial by comparison. The wide gaping disparity between godly commanded genocide and loving your neighbor is too wide to justify honestly or rationally.
As an aside, I believe the chief value of the Bible is the documentation of the evolution or transformation of human ethics, such as:
Love your tribal neighbor -> Love your non-tribal neighbor -> Love your enemy.
  —iceage
This observation so neatly sums up the problem I (and I presume others) have with Biblical fundamentalists, as any thinking person IMHO would have concerning fundamentalists of any religious, political, or a combination of both, persuasions.
Edited by anglagard, : add an appropriate comma
Edited by anglagard, : correct msg=

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-26-2007 4:03 AM anglagard has not replied
 Message 23 by arachnophilia, posted 08-26-2007 9:54 PM anglagard has not replied

Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3619 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 22 of 25 (418055)
08-26-2007 4:03 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by anglagard
08-26-2007 3:25 AM


Re: iceage in Great Debate
Seconded. I was delighted to see iceage note the progression of moral thought over the centuries. Astute observation.
Anyone endeavouring to follow Christ's teachings has to start with "Love your enemy" and go from there. To start with "the Bible is inerrant" and rationalize from that is to follow something else. That path goes into some truly dank places.

Author: iceage
Forum: The Great Debate
Thread: Biblical Coherency (Rob and Iceage Only)
MSG #: http://EvC Forum: Biblical Coherency (Rob and Iceage Only) -->EvC Forum: Biblical Coherency (Rob and Iceage Only)

____
Edited by Archer Opterix, : brev.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by anglagard, posted 08-26-2007 3:25 AM anglagard has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 23 of 25 (418195)
08-26-2007 9:54 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by anglagard
08-26-2007 3:25 AM


Re: iceage in Great Debate
third. this particular bit:
quote:
As an aside, I believe the chief value of the Bible is the documentation of the evolution or transformation of human ethics, such as:
Love your tribal neighbor -> Love your non-tribal neighbor -> Love your enemy.
was the primary thing i was wanting to interject into this discussion from the beginning, but was prevented from doing because it was GD.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by anglagard, posted 08-26-2007 3:25 AM anglagard has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 24 of 25 (419021)
08-31-2007 12:50 PM


Molbiogirl for everything in a thread
Holistic Doctors, and medicine
I have been impressed with Molbiogirl's posts everywhere and maybe this thread just exemplifies the careful, well presented and fact laden posts the always does.
I just felt it was time for a bit of recognition for them all.

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by molbiogirl, posted 08-31-2007 3:04 PM NosyNed has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2663 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 25 of 25 (419043)
08-31-2007 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by NosyNed
08-31-2007 12:50 PM


Re: Molbiogirl for everything in a thread
[blush]
Aw, Ned.
Thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by NosyNed, posted 08-31-2007 12:50 PM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024