|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 60 (9209 total) |
| |
Skylink | |
Total: 919,487 Year: 6,744/9,624 Month: 84/238 Week: 1/83 Day: 1/24 Hour: 1/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 2767 days) Posts: 2544 From: boulder, colorado Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The "Digital Code" of DNA | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
How is that information anything other than the structure of the molecule?
Because it comprises the encoded gene. Are you really denying that genes are encoded on DNA? Are you also saying that Watson and Crick should give back their Nobel Prize in chemistry? ”HM Edited by Hoot Mon, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
Ringo, you wrote:
We're talking about how the genes are "encoded". I'm saying that the "code" is simply the structure of the DNA molecule.
Thank you demonstrating my point about SNPs. I guess you agree then that a codon is a genetic "word" that expresses any one of 20 amino acids. Case closed. Here's a simple schematic of a molecule:
It can carry different "information" just by the arrangement of the components:
What's the problem? ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
Ringo, you wrote:
There is no "code" other than the structure of the molecule.
I do see what you are saying here: If there were no structural DNA molecules there would be no genetic code. Of course that's true. And if there were no musical instruments there would be no music either. Yet music and genes have meaning beyond their respective tools of performance. Remember, a gene does not die when its chromosome is destroyed; there are many copies of it in the gene pool”redundantly digital information. Neither does a song die when a player and his paino and sheet music are lost in a fire. I don't mean to say there is anything necessarily ethereal about genes or music, only that their meanings can be intrepreted digitally in a digital context (which is ethereal enough for me, btw). ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
WK wrote:
A lot of things given the high level of polymorphism which can be present without having any structural effect at all on the produced protein. Do you think you could change every third note of a Piano concerto and get away with it?
No. That's the beauty of the genetic alphabet; it has evolved redundancy in its code definitions as a means to defend against third-order SNPs. ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
HM wrote:
happy_atheist replied: Music is carried by the molecular structure of a CD too, but that doesn’t mean that music is only a condition of structured plastic molecules. The same thing is true for genes. That isn't true, the music is not in any way imprinted onto the molecular structure of the CD. All that is on the CD is a collection of metaphorical 1's and 0's. So the question is, can exactly the same sequence of DNA produce different proteins? Does CAG represent on (and only one) protein.
CAG does not "represent" a protein. CAG is a codon of three digital nucleotides, which codes for the amino acid glutamine. It takes many codons to hold the digital instructions of an entire protein.
I'd argue that all catalysts carry the same type of information as DNA (because from my limited understanding DNA appears to catylyse protein production). So yes, if a rock has a catalytic property then it would carry the same type of information as DNA.
I don't understand what you are saying. DNA certainly does not catalyze a protein. DNA is remote to the chemical production of proteins. (I threw in "chemical for Ringo's sake, who believes molecules are only chemicals and have no way to store digital codes.) DNA is linked to proteins only by way of code translation, which is performed by messenger RNA. ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
Noted, but it doesn't change my point. Can CAG code form anything other than glutamine?
No.
Does the physical structure of DNA directly determine the chemicals produced via deterministic physical (or chemical if you prefer) processes, or is there something arbitary in there imposed on top?...I think you missed the actual point of my post. I know that DNA produces RNA, which then is involved in producing proteins. That still is not in any way an analogy of the production of sound from a CD. It is an analogy of the production of sound from an LP though as far as I can see....However on the CD all you have is a bit pattern of 1's and 0's.
What you don't seem to understand is that A,G,T, and C are the "bits" of the digital genetic code. I suspect that you are fixed on the idea that digital coding must involve 1's and 0's. If this is true then you need to rexamine your position.
That is why the sounds you hear are not directly imprinted onto the CD in the same way as they are on an LP.
An LP recording is not digital, but instead analog, and therefore it is not in any way equivalent to to the genetic code. A CD recording is digital is every respect, and so are the genes on DNA. Perhaps you should take a closer look at how genes operate and how mutations occur. ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
Nevertheless, directly or indirectly, it's the "shape" of the DNA molecule that determines what proteins are produced, with no need of a fictitious "code".
"Fictitious" only if it offends your chemical religion. Maybe then we should demand that Watson & Crick give back their Nobel Prize in chemistry, and that Crick should retract his pivotal paper on the origin of the genetic code (1968, J. Mol. Biol., 38:367-379). How can two such astute chemists wander so far off into the digital woo-woos of genetic encryption and get away with it? ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
I use the word "fictitious" because you have still not produced one shred of evidence that the "digital code" of DNA is fact and not fiction
Well, Bill Hamilton was fond of referring to the "narrow roads of Gene Land.
Show us where Crick and Watson talk about a genetic code that is separate from the chemical properties of the molecule.
This is an absurd assertion. Of course there are no gene fairies who lift the codes gently off the DNA molecules and keep them safe in their digital hooches until they can be selected for or aganist by Mother Nature or Father Time. Is that what you think I am saying? Is this how people do their thinking up there in Canuckistan? ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
Sorry, rob. Can't go there. Too busy picking my nose.
”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
To recap, here's what I'm saying: DNA operates according to chemical principles. Period. The physical arrangement of the atoms on the molecule can be interpreted as a "code", but there is no code above and beyond the physical arrangement of the atoms in the molecule. Period.
Ringo, are you suggesting that I am referring to a metaphysical code? I fail to grasp the importance of your point. Of course it's all about physical arrangements of nucleotides. The literal equivalent to what you are saying would be something like ...'there can be no written language without words' or 'there are no oceans without water.' Ay? ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
Ringo wrote:
No one ever said that genetic code is "somehow above and beyond the structure of the DNA molecule." That's just more tripe rolling off your finger tips. You need to get clear about what you are saying. And you have not yet shown us how or why genetic code is NOT digital. Still waiting for the revelation. The issue is whether or not genetic information is a "digital code" that is somehow above and beyond the structure of the DNA molecule. ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
Then why do you keep arguing? Because you refuse to see that nucleic acids are capable of encoding, storing, translating, and transmitting digital genetic information. That's all. ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
Do you know of any other natural molecules besides nucleic acids that contain digital codes?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
The "code" is simply a human construct used to help understand the structure. It's simpler to write a short code-word than to draw the whole structure of the molecule. That's all the "code" is. It isn't something inherent in the molecule itself.
Wrong! If DNA is not inherently capable of storing digital code, wherein the nucleotides A, C, T, and G serve as digits, then how do you explain genetic mutation by way of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)? ”HM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Fosdick  Suspended Member (Idle past 5754 days) Posts: 1793 From: Upper Slobovia Joined: |
I said that the "code" is the structure of the molecule.
Of course it is, physically, but your point is quite silly. The same thing could be said about a written language: 'Words are in the structure of the sentence, or letters are in the structure of the word.' What does that mean? Of course they are. And of course you have to have something physical to hold a code. No one's saying that genetic codes fly around on their own. Can we get past that now? ”HM
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024