Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Do you share the optimism of Edward O Wilson?
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4024 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 18 of 22 (403103)
05-31-2007 8:26 PM


Gaia teaches
One thing I have learnt from life is that if 'we' don`t adapt to changing conditions, Gaia will soon correct us. Many species have faced change in the past by extinction, adaptation or moving geologically. With arable land declining due to construction, overusage or the current threat, lack of water, where will populations move to?
With essential minerals exploited (and wasted) by the human race, can substitutes fill the gap? Tin is a finite resource for canning, so we change to plastics. Which are usually petroleum-based. Oil supplies seem to be limited, yet we are reluctant to expand to alternative energy sources in a major way. Which won`t help products based on petroleum when that runs low.
We over-apply fertilisers, pesticides to crops and let the surplus poison the majority of water systems. In the poorer countries, slash-and-burn continues to lay waste increasing areas with few restrictions on farmers. And who can blame them? They are just trying to survive. Eventually, Gaia will provide the wall of no returns.
Even the seas of the world are facing declining catches in spite of their size and prolificacy. Any responsible moves by fishermen to limit their catches? Nope, they just move into deeper or more unpalatable species.
So, regardless of well-meaning efforts to change our wasteful ways and live lives adjusted to a balance between need and availability, mankind will proceed to the point where we either kill each other in a fight for resources, or we may try to rope in both our population and our consumption. Either way, Gaia will triumph. Another pesky species reined in. Evolution in action.
With our track record, I can`t see the sensible approach winning. I know which side I`m betting on.
Edited by Nighttrain, : Clarification

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by ogon, posted 06-01-2007 6:45 PM Nighttrain has replied

  
Nighttrain
Member (Idle past 4024 days)
Posts: 1512
From: brisbane,australia
Joined: 06-08-2004


Message 21 of 22 (403305)
06-01-2007 7:41 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by ogon
06-01-2007 6:45 PM


Re: education
Praise to you, Ogon, for trying to make a difference. My son taught at a few English schools, but gave it away to tutor because of how the pupils were allowed to run the classes. With the blessings of staff and principal (anything to avoid upsetting parents).
In Australia, many schools have ecology projects, gardens, nature study areas set aside to involve pupils at the primary level. High schools (secondary) seem to leave these aside, but often take field trips. Unfortunately, the lessons learnt don`t seem to be carried into adulthood. The same old attitude of 'the world is yours, go ahead and rape it' is still paramount in community and business. When the chickens come home to roost, I wonder if the excuse will be 'why didn`t someone tell us?'

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by ogon, posted 06-01-2007 6:45 PM ogon has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024