quote:
I find that with you it's useless to try and support anything. No matter what I produce, you reject it, regardless of how substantial it is, just like in the Olivet Discourse debate where you apply centuries worth of events to a few decades. You allege it's not prophetic when significant segments of it clearly apply to the latter days. FYI, the discourse goes the whole chapter in all four gospels.
You mean that because I actually read the Bible I spot all your efforts to twist and misrepresent it. That is what happened in the discussion of the Olivet Discourse.
Do you want to reme r some of your lowlights ? Like you isnsitence that we should let the phrasing of the Disciples question in Matthew dictate our reading of the Discourse - ignoring the content of the Discourse itself, even though the phrasing in Mark was different. Your twisting of the Biblical requirement for three witnesses so you wouldn't have to admit that you were wrong ? Hey' it's on;ly the Bible, it's MUCH less important than Buzsaw's ego !
And FYI the Olivet Discourse isn't even IN John.
quote:
If I produce the references you'll deny as usual with more demands for responses, so don't be surprised if I decline to respond to some of your input.
In other words you're either refusing to look up the references because you're too lazy or because you know you'd have to twist and misrepresent them and you're fed up with being caught doing it.