(Dalrymple GB, Moore JG: Science 1968;161:1132-5)
39 years old, and the abstract says
Submarine pillow basalts from Kilauea Volcano contain excess radiogenic argon-40 and give anomalously high potassium-argon ages. Glassy rims of pillows show a systematic increase in radiogenic argon-40 with depth, and a pillow from a depth of 2590 meters shows a decrease in radiogenic argon40 inward from the pillow rim. The data indicate that the amount of excess radiogenic argon-40 is a direct function of both hydrostatic pressure and rate of cooling, and that many submarine basalts are not suitable for potassium-argon dating.
(my emphasis)
Noble CS, Naughton JJ: Science 1968;162:265-7
39 years old, and the
title says
Deep-Ocean Basalts: Inert Gas Content and Uncertainties in Age Dating
Reserve, do you think the authors were complete morons, or perhaps is it your source being less than forthright with what they know?