Jehovas Witness Bible, any exclusive contradictions?

No, not can't, as in, not allowed. But 'can't' as in 'what sense would it make'? Given the gospels we have as canon, we can't flip-flop our over-all idea of Jesus to match, Sure, we can throw away a part of canon. But I am talking WITH this canon. We must find a reason to cohere them, or else toss one. And if we toss one, it can't be on the grounds of 'I dont like it'. This late in the game such a thing is very suspicious. I understand. But saying someone is 'more christian' is a recent term. It stems from centuries of 'knowing' what a christian is supposed to be. I am not saying that it is right, but it is a line drawing in some areas. There are other requirements, but sure they are not requirements for real. It is just a thing which has become common that people assosciate when they hear the word. Christians in general believe in a Trinity. It has nothing to do with inerrancy. Put Luther in the Bible and people will study him, period, whether they believe in inerrancy or not. No...all Buddhists see Buddha as a person and teacher. Same with Marx. If someone starts calling them God, they might be called something else. There has to be human words to define different people. If there are different types of Buddhists, there will be different words, That is why JW's are JW's, and Catholics are Catholics. It is also not realistic to say that JW's follow the same Jesus or follow HIm the same way. That may be, to us. But not to God. We will have to see. See you next week.