Actually, I thank you for your comments. I am not a geologist, so, naturally, when I saw some of your rather convincing replies, I decided to read up a little more on both sides.
The rock formations in the Kiabab uplift are at a greater-than-90 degree angle when showing run-offs into the Colorado river. This is evidence of lake drainage, and not simply tributaries. Study the plains just northeast of the Kiabab, and you might find erosion evidence in the deserted areas--indicating water was once present across some of the desert... If you built a dam across the Grand Canyon, you'll notice that a giant lake would fill in behind it, covering land from several states. Interesting enough, this is sufficient evidence to at least merrit further investigation on this topic.
I apologize for some mistakes I may have come across and used it as evidence without going into greater detail in the field of geology, but I think that, before jumping to the conclusion that the canyon is "millions of years old" more research is to be done on both the creationists' and the evolutionists' sides.
In Christ,
Booboo