|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Discrimination against homosexuals carried into the 21st century | |||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
January 2007 would be the 21st century. (Easy to miss - still no flying cars and robot butlers, I notice.)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Oh, but they conjugate, too Both ways, typically; if you think that's exactly like a normal heterosexual relationship in humans, then I suggest you need to stop picking up "women" in bars with names like "The Manhole." Also, much like your little adventures, bacterial conjugation is not a form of sexual reproduction because gametes are not fused to form a zygote. Rather, bacterial conjugation simply represents an exchange of donor mobile plasmids between individuals. No new individuals are created.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Rob, could you substantiate your assertion that preventing same-sex marriage will reduce the incidence of sexual abuse of children?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
I thought gays were born that way, no choice at all. People are born with their sexual orientation (in all likelyhood in most cases), but people are not born with the wherewithall to consent to sexual activity. But, of course, I suspect you already knew that when you attempted to sandbag the debate by equivocating homosexuality with peodphilia. I don't know if you have to be Christian to be dishonest, but in my experience it certainly makes it easier.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
But would you mind showing me where I said it was "a form sexual reproduction." Message 147, your words:
quote: When Shraf disagreed that this was how bacteria reproduced, you contradicted her in message 169:
quote: Where you clearly make the assertion that bacterial conjugation was an additional form of bacterial reproduction, which it is not.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
I never asserted such a thing. Nonsense, you asserted it before and you continue to repeat the assertion. If you believe that same-sex unions increase the incidence of sexual abuse of children, then either you believe that preventing them will decrease the incidence - or you're tacitly admitting that there is no connection, you're completely unconcerned about the sexual abuse of children, and motivated only by hatred towards homosexuals engaged in perfectly legal, legitmate private conduct. So, again, I'm asking you if you can substantiate your assertion that the prevention of same-sex marriage reduces the incidence of sexual abuse of children.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Because they start threads justifying human actions because animals engage in such activity. Because they have taken on the mind of an animal, and become an animal (spiritually). And the physical manifestations follow. Could you substantiate your assertion that animals regularly possess the intelligence, communication skills, and manual dexterity to operate computers and create threads on internet forum boards? Could you substantiate your assertion that homosexuals regularly develop fur, claws, boxlike muzzles, canine dentition, and heightened senses of hearing and scent?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
I wonder if all you homos and homophiles are happy now that you forced poor Rob to take down his cross and go home. "Homos"? "Homophiles?" Is it necessary to use bigoted language? If Rob isn't interested in supporting his statements with evidence, but in throwing bitch-fits instead, I hope he stays gone. Who gives a shit?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Oh, and crashforg, you've got a bad habit of deliberately misquoting and misrepresenting other posters. Well, that's an absolute falsehood, though you certainly have a bad habit of making these spurious accusations as smokescreens. I quoted your statement verbatim, exactly as you made it, and precisely contrary to your implication otherwise.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
See, I don't see what remarks like that contribute to the debate. They seem unneccesarily belligerent and contrary to the Forum guidelines, particularly rule 10.
You don't seem particularly interested in legitimate debate. Why is that?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
It's working perfectly; he's just not any good at it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
That's why my liberal past and my libertarian present Oh, that explains it. We've got a glibertarian here, folks.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
I just happen to hold the opinion that marriage is for opposite sexes in order for them to start a family. Fair enough. How about your opinion can dictate the terms of your marriage, and other people's opinions can govern their own? And then you can stop all the bigoted panty-sniffing? By the way - how, exactly, does a libertarian come to the conclusion that he gets veto power over other people's marriages?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
I'm not sure why the disagreement with civil unions is so strong. Well, for one thing - they don't exist. At least not in the US. We do have marriage, on the other hand.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1496 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
I don't know what I am politically You're a bigot and a homophobe, HM. That's what you are. That's why every single one of your posts drips with contempt and revulsion towards gays and their defenders. It's why you think that the rest of us must be ignorant about what homosexuals do in the bedroom, and if we only knew, why, then we're come around to your eminently sensible hatred of all things queer. It's why you think that this:
Did you know that some gays have claimed Christopher Robin as one of their own represents some kind of gay assault or appropriation of your "normal" culture, instead of the entirely common phenomenon of people feeling kinship and self-recognition with characters in books. (Christopher Robin Milne, A.A. Milne's son and the basis for the character, was not gay, as far as anyone can tell.)
I guess I'm just behind the times. Pretty much. I had thought your brand of bigotry died with Reagan. I guess I was wrong.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024