Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Tax-The-Church
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5541 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 31 of 36 (376356)
01-11-2007 10:10 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Hyroglyphx
01-11-2007 4:10 PM


Re: Taxing religious institutions
My church funds various ministries, such as, but not limited to, overseas witnessing...
The other ministries are fine. But overseas witnessing shouldn`t be considered a charity

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-11-2007 4:10 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5541 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 32 of 36 (376357)
01-11-2007 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by ringo
01-11-2007 7:13 PM


Re: Taxing religious institutions
General Motors is trying to sell you something. What is a witness talking about Jesus selling you?
Salvation?
From my viewpoint, your advertising is no different from GM's.
From that point of view, it is actually worse then a GM`s advertising because it is trying to sell you something that it might not be able to deliver

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by ringo, posted 01-11-2007 7:13 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by ringo, posted 01-11-2007 10:25 PM fallacycop has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 432 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 33 of 36 (376359)
01-11-2007 10:25 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by fallacycop
01-11-2007 10:15 PM


Re: Taxing religious institutions
fallacycop writes:
... it is actually worse then a GM`s advertising because it is trying to sell you something that it might not be able to deliver
Yeah, there is the scam aspect to it - but even the proceeds of crime are taxable.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by fallacycop, posted 01-11-2007 10:15 PM fallacycop has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 36 (376361)
01-11-2007 10:27 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by ringo
01-11-2007 9:41 PM


Re: Taxing religious institutions
I said you should pay taxes on all the money you collect (whether you collect that money for playing basketball or for preaching).
Or what will happen to me? If my parents send me a check for Christmas, am I required by law to track down the IRS and give them that money? No. Why? Because it was a charity. As long as my parents and I pay taxes, in other words, what we legitimately owe, we are not required by law to pay a tax on that transaction.
The difference between you and the Lakers is that they have more fans.
What are you talking about? The Lakers generate money. Its a business that extends much further than people on the court. People playing a pick up game of basketball make no money doing so. No money is involved. If there is, its considered illegal gambling. You are bordering on the absurd now.
quote:
since when do "groups" need to pay taxes?
Since taxes were invented.
You implied that as long as a group exists, they are to be taxed, whether or not any money is involved. If I run into a group of homeless people, am I required to contact the IRS so they can take a percentage of that charity?
quote:
Single people are exempt from taxes? That's news to me.
Don't know where you got that. Not from me, that's for sure.
You said that groups, any group, is to be taxed.
quote:
I already told you. They aren't selling anything.
And I already told you they are.
And you are still neglecting to give me an example. In one instance you offered, "salvation," which is patently absurd. You've offered nothing since. This will now be third time I ask what a witness is selling to its listeners.
You're using the "organized crime defense" - "We're a private club. We don't sell liquor. Our members just pay dues."
Members of organized ARE selling things, whether they call it paying dues or anything else. That much is certain. Its called "Racketeering" and its a serious offense.
I haven't said anything about taxing charities. I've been talking about taxing churches.
Excuse me? You said that any "organization" or "group" has to pay taxes.
quote:
The members of the church are already "giving" away more money than you do who ONLY pays their taxes!
On the contrary, by paying less than their share of taxes, they're increasing my tax burden. They're taking money out of my pocket.
LOL! How so? The citizens, church-going or not, pay their taxes. They are "giving" that money to the church/charity of their choice. It doesn't effect you in the slightest. You want to know who effects you? Its your own welfare state that coddles the lazy and demonizes the hard working. That's whose taking your hard earned money. In which case, take that up with your government.
quote:
Church abiding citizens not only render to Caesar but pay beyond what they OWE. "Owe" being another operative word.
But they're not paying the taxes that they (morally) owe. Instead of using the money for the good of society (feeding the hungry, etc.) they're skimming off the top for their own use.
You can't make blanket statements like that about all churches in the world. We all know that there are definitely some church leaders that immorally skim from the top. It doesn't take very long to catch those people in the act, nor does it take very long for their insatiable greed to not only corrupt their better judgement, but for them to do something illegal-- in which case law enforcement will handle them, but more importantly, God.
quote:
Salvation can't be purchased. Its given, just like any charitable deed.
Danger, thin ice there, buddy. Are you saying that the church gives salvation?
You get an "A" for effort on trying to turn it around on me, but I've already quoted you. I asked what the church is selling in order for you to tax them. You responded, "Salvation?"
Once again, that's the organized crime defense. Money comes in the door, salvation goes out the door (or comfort, peace of mind, what have you). You can claim there's no "exchange", but the books have to balance. (That's how they got Al Capone.)
If any church claims to "sell" salvation like those sharks on TBN, their going to be exposed. No one can grant salvation but God alone.
I have explained: organizations like the Lakers and GM have to pay taxes, so should organizations like Joe's Church and Car Wash. You haven't shown any significant difference between those organizations.
I haven't shown you any significant difference? You haven't shown how they correlate. GM is a business. A church is a charity.
quote:
If your parents send you a check for 100 dollars, should you claim that on your W-2?
There are specific regulations regarding gifts and inheritances but yes, as a general rule they are taxable.
Gifts are taxable? Who gets taxed? The person receiving the gift or the person sending the gift or both?
But we're not talking about what is legal now. We're trying to get the law changed to be fair to everybody.
Why isn't fair when everyone gets taxed the same already? Again, all of the church's members already pay taxes. Why should they have the money they give taxed also, especially since nothing was purchased?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by ringo, posted 01-11-2007 9:41 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by ringo, posted 01-11-2007 11:02 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 432 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 35 of 36 (376367)
01-11-2007 11:02 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Hyroglyphx
01-11-2007 10:27 PM


Re: Taxing religious institutions
nemesis_juggernaut writes:
If my parents send me a check for Christmas, am I required by law to track down the IRS and give them that money? No. Why? Because it was a charity.
No, your parents giving you a gift is not charity.
The Lakers generate money. Its a business that extends much further than people on the court. People playing a pick up game of basketball make no money doing so. No money is involved.
For @#$% sake, pay attention: I said that if you made money you would have to pay taxes on it the same as the Lakers do. The only difference between your organization and the Laker organization is the money. Similarly, if a church collects money, it should have to pay taxes on it the same as the Lakers do or GM does.
You implied that as long as a group exists, they are to be taxed, whether or not any money is involved.
Not at all.
You said that groups, any group, is to be taxed.
I said that any group that collects money should be taxed equally. Do you only read the first half of every sentence?
This will now be third time I ask what a witness is selling to its listeners.
And this is now the third time I'm answering: salvation, comfort, peace of mind.... Your patent on absurdity has expired. It is a sale whether you admit it or not.
You said that any "organization" or "group" has to pay taxes.
Yes, and I said that any legitimate charitable activities - e.g. feeding the hungry - should be exempt. Was I not clear enough about that? I can put it in the first half of the sentence if that will help.
The citizens, church-going or not, pay their taxes. They are "giving" that money to the church/charity of their choice. It doesn't effect you in the slightest.
Of course it does. If the church-going citizens paid their share at church, the general tax kitty would be fuller and my share of the burden would be less. Simple math. It's the same as anybody else cheating on their taxes or shoplifting, etc. It effects all of us honest folks.
You want to know who effects you? Its your own welfare state that coddles the lazy and demonizes the hard working. That's whose taking your hard earned money.
Sure, and the church-going citizens should be paying their share of that burden at church.
We all know that there are definitely some church leaders that immorally skim from the top.
The skimming off the top that I'm talking about is money used for proselytizing.
GM is a business. A church is a charity.
A church is not a charity. A church is an organization which may or may not undertake charitable activities. So is GM. No difference.
Why isn't fair when everyone gets taxed the same already?
Not the same as GM gets taxed.
Again, all of the church's members already pay taxes.
And so do GM's stockholders.
Why should they have the money they give taxed also, especially since nothing was purchased?
Suppose GM changes their marketing plan: from now on, all cars are free - but they pass the offering plate. Are you seriously suggesting that "nothing is purchased"? Are you seriously suggesting that GM would be allowed to get away with not paying taxes if they pulled a scam like that?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Hyroglyphx, posted 01-11-2007 10:27 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
ohnhai
Member (Idle past 5182 days)
Posts: 649
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2004


Message 36 of 36 (376452)
01-12-2007 8:00 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by RAZD
01-09-2007 6:04 PM


Re: Taxing religious institutions
indeed (thus my point regarding oversight of charities that the church is not held to.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by RAZD, posted 01-09-2007 6:04 PM RAZD has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024