Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Foundations of the Debate
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5551 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 3 of 133 (348551)
09-12-2006 10:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Righteous Skeptic
09-12-2006 10:09 PM


Evolution does not deny the existence of God, but some creationists deny the existence of evolution, hence the debate

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Righteous Skeptic, posted 09-12-2006 10:09 PM Righteous Skeptic has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by dwise1, posted 09-13-2006 3:50 PM fallacycop has not replied

  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5551 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 11 of 133 (348591)
09-13-2006 12:32 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Righteous Skeptic
09-12-2006 11:50 PM


Re: The Reason
In conclusion, that is why the
debate exists, because evolutionists have insisted on creating a
world where they do not need God, and creationists have insisted on
disagreeing with them.
That makes no sense. Evolutionists are not creating worlds. They are just investigating the nature of this world and going wherever the evidence takes them. that's the hallmark of a good science.
You reasonson's to dislike evolution seem to be all filosophical in nature and completely irrelevant to whether the theory is true or not. I't important to keep in mind that disliking a theory is not a reason good enough to dimiss that theory.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Righteous Skeptic, posted 09-12-2006 11:50 PM Righteous Skeptic has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Righteous Skeptic, posted 09-13-2006 3:18 PM fallacycop has not replied

  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5551 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 13 of 133 (348597)
09-13-2006 12:38 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Righteous Skeptic
09-13-2006 12:23 AM


Re: The Reason
He wanted it to be obvious so that those who know him will praise him
If S/he wanted it to be obvious then explain to me how come it isn't?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Righteous Skeptic, posted 09-13-2006 12:23 AM Righteous Skeptic has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Righteous Skeptic, posted 09-13-2006 3:23 PM fallacycop has not replied

  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5551 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 51 of 133 (349089)
09-14-2006 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Righteous Skeptic
09-13-2006 3:52 PM


Obvious means obvious
The truth as uncovered by science is that it is not obvious that God made the Earth.
That depends on the opionion of the person you are talking to.
This is self-contradictory because obvious is, by definition, something that every (reasonable) person agrees to be true. If it depends in the person you are talking to, then it cannot be obvious.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Righteous Skeptic, posted 09-13-2006 3:52 PM Righteous Skeptic has not replied

  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5551 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 80 of 133 (349714)
09-17-2006 12:18 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by suzy
09-16-2006 9:48 PM


Your posts are hard to understand
I am having a hard time understanding your posts. In almost every post there are at least a couple of phrases that don't seem to connect to what you were saying before or to what anybody else has said before. For instance, the phrase:
So if the media isn't so powerfull in forming peoples opinions, why don't we get as many 'teen coming of age' movies that explain the science behind sexual morality, like the bonding hormone released by women during intercourse that explains why men keep being stalked by women who really thought they only wanted casual sex?
what's that got to do with what you were saying before? If there is a logical connection, you should have included it in your post. If you were answering someone else's post, you could have included a quote to the relevant statement, making your own post more comprehensible (quote boxes like the one above make the textmore clean and easyer to understand. press the peek button at the lower righthand corner to see how it's done.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by suzy, posted 09-16-2006 9:48 PM suzy has not replied

  
fallacycop
Member (Idle past 5551 days)
Posts: 692
From: Fortaleza-CE Brazil
Joined: 02-18-2006


Message 82 of 133 (349721)
09-17-2006 1:17 AM
Reply to: Message 81 by suzy
09-17-2006 12:51 AM


Re: problems, issues and attitudes
Now many people stumble at the thought man was created in Gods image, as common sence tells us our bodies aren't 'God Like'.
But that original creation DIED when Death came into the world, and God covered us in skin, to keep our rotting selves in, so anti-Christs have seeded our minds with images of fig leafs and ugg boots, and keep ignoring this very important Biblical detail of our current carnality?
Eh??? didn't we have skin before the sin?? That' the first time I ever heard anything like that. where does that doctrine come from?
OFF TOPIC - Please Do Not Respond to this message or continue in this vein.
AdminPD See Message 86
Edited by AdminPD, : Off Topic Warning

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by suzy, posted 09-17-2006 12:51 AM suzy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by Faith, posted 09-17-2006 4:50 AM fallacycop has not replied
 Message 85 by suzy, posted 09-17-2006 5:04 AM fallacycop has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024