Thanks for more wasted time.
I watched the first one. It's not a good critique of why evolution is a bad concept.
It wasn't designed to be. It was designed to show how ID is a good conept.
It doesn't do that either.
All the first video demonstrates is an argument from incredulity gussied up to appeal to gullible people.
It doesn't SHOW a thing other than what currently exists in nature with the ASSERTION that it couldn't have evolved.
The second video is just the
Post hoc, ergo propter hoc argument - another logical fallacy -- also gussied up to appeal to gullible people.
It blatantly assumes that any life bearing system must be exactly like ours. That has not been demonstrated.
Neither one presents any information that proves that life absolutely could not have occurred, either here or elsewhere, they have just made assertions to that effect.
In both cases they also use the argument from authority -- another logical fallacy -- nor do they present any evidence that these opinions are representative (although they try to give that impression by the total omission of dissenting views).
Neither one presents any evidence that would in any way indicate that intelligent design has a valid concept. They claim it, but they don't show it.
There is no evidence here, no substance. It's not even good science fiction.
I agree with obvious Child that these are a complete waste of time.
Enjoy.
{abe}
I thought I remembered "Illustra Media" from somewhere
http://www.nmsr.org/smkg-gun.htmThe North Texas Skeptic
It's a scam group trying to pretend to be something it isn't. Like honest.
From the second link:
quote:
UML presents itself as a well-crafted, purely scientific documentary, while it is factually misleading in many respects, and its main purpose is propaganda for a pseudo-scientific movement known as Intelligent Design Creationism. UML has its (strategically concealed) origins close to religious fundamentalist and Creationist circles, and displays a pattern of poor scholarship, including misrepresentation/omission of key scientific evidence. Ultimately, these result in a misleading picture of the facts and of current scientific knowledge, as well as of the ultimate goals of the documentary itself.2
In otherwords it is a pack of lies in a pretty package designed to fool gullible people. It doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny.
Enjoy.
{/abe}
Edited by RAZD, : added end
Join the effort to unravel {AIDS/HIV} {Protenes} and {Cancer} with Team EvC! (click)
we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.