Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,455 Year: 3,712/9,624 Month: 583/974 Week: 196/276 Day: 36/34 Hour: 2/14


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Design evidence # 111: The heart
Peter
Member (Idle past 1501 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 76 of 82 (33606)
03-04-2003 4:24 AM
Reply to: Message 72 by DanskerMan
03-04-2003 12:03 AM


Your argument was that the complexity and inter-dependence
evident in living systems was an indication of design.
I said that complexity and design are unrelated (in the sense
that your argument requires) pointing out that simplicity is
the hallmark of good design.
PaulK pointed out that many software projects (due to external
constraints on time, money, personnel, etc.) have an ad hoc,
iterative, additive development that leads to excessively
complex, highly inter-dependent software architectures.
You have now suggested that we cannot claim design without
knwing what is good, simple, etc.
Hopefully you can now see why it is that complexity cannot be
used to infer design ... no matter how much may wish to see
design.
I opened a thread some time ago asking for design criteria.
Not suprisingly there was little relevant response.
Oh, and I might add for those who argue from IC, that I have seen
software systems which have been built up in an ad hoc manner
over time that have increased in function (and complexity ... or
messiness as I call it ) where, due to the way that things
have been added, if a function is removed the whole program fails
to work ... and yet there is a revision history that shows
how the current program was developed iteratively.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by DanskerMan, posted 03-04-2003 12:03 AM DanskerMan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by Minnemooseus, posted 03-04-2003 10:27 AM Peter has not replied

  
compmage
Member (Idle past 5175 days)
Posts: 601
From: South Africa
Joined: 08-04-2005


Message 77 of 82 (33610)
03-04-2003 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by Peter
03-03-2003 3:01 PM


Peter writes:
quote:

What language is that in? 8000 lines seems a little
sedate {edited 'cause I forgot the smiley}

COBOL on an AS400.
------------------
Signature too long, 100 chars max.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Peter, posted 03-03-2003 3:01 PM Peter has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by Peter, posted 03-05-2003 5:42 AM compmage has not replied

  
compmage
Member (Idle past 5175 days)
Posts: 601
From: South Africa
Joined: 08-04-2005


Message 78 of 82 (33611)
03-04-2003 5:36 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by nator
03-03-2003 8:10 PM


schrafinator writes:
quote:

Wow, I've never heard of getting MORE wisdom teeth than the usual four.

Nor had I, until the dentist told me he would have cut partially into my jawbone in order to remove my all 5 my wisdom teeth.
------------------
Signature too long, 100 chars max.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by nator, posted 03-03-2003 8:10 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by nator, posted 03-07-2003 9:11 AM compmage has not replied

  
compmage
Member (Idle past 5175 days)
Posts: 601
From: South Africa
Joined: 08-04-2005


Message 79 of 82 (33612)
03-04-2003 5:39 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Admin
03-04-2003 12:27 AM


Admin writes:
quote:

The software for this website is 43,000 lines of Perl code.

That 8000 old line is for a program that reads threw all the transaction for the day and splits them off to extract file for 20 odd reports.
------------------
Signature too long, 100 chars max.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Admin, posted 03-04-2003 12:27 AM Admin has not replied

  
Minnemooseus
Member
Posts: 3945
From: Duluth, Minnesota, U.S. (West end of Lake Superior)
Joined: 11-11-2001
Member Rating: 10.0


Message 80 of 82 (33621)
03-04-2003 10:27 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by Peter
03-04-2003 4:24 AM


ID / IC computer program analogy
Peter, I think this little side topic of sorts deserves a topic of its own (even if there ends up being little further discussion).
As it is, it is buried somewhere where it's going to get lost.
How about starting an ID topic on this. Maybe something like "Computer Programs: Intelligent Design and Evolution". Include a link back to a relevent message in this topic.
Moose
Added by edit:
There is now a new topic, "Software Maintenance, Intelligent Design, and Evolution", at http://EvC Forum: Software Maintenance, Intelligent Design, and Evolution -->EvC Forum: Software Maintenance, Intelligent Design, and Evolution
It was started by lpetrich.
[This message has been edited by minnemooseus, 03-05-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Peter, posted 03-04-2003 4:24 AM Peter has not replied

  
Peter
Member (Idle past 1501 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 81 of 82 (33681)
03-05-2003 5:42 AM
Reply to: Message 77 by compmage
03-04-2003 5:33 AM


Ouch!!!!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by compmage, posted 03-04-2003 5:33 AM compmage has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 82 of 82 (33840)
03-07-2003 9:11 AM
Reply to: Message 78 by compmage
03-04-2003 5:36 AM


Holy crap, that sounds terrible!
Were they all lined up or stacked on top of each other?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by compmage, posted 03-04-2003 5:36 AM compmage has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024