SLPx writes:
I am not declaring anything. I am just pointing out the increasing lunacy in Borger's posts.
The measure of anyone's success in debate is the number of others they've convinced, not their own undeniably biased self-impression.
I wouldn't worry about convincing Peter Borger that's he making fundamental logical errors - that's unlikely to happen. Your task, and his, is to make it clear to those following along that the other's position is untenable. Making fundamental logic errors is anathema to this goal, and whether an opponent acknowledges the mistake or not makes no difference to those who witnessed the error. There's no point beating a dead horse, even if the opponent won't admit it's dead. There's greater advantage to simply moving forward and pointing out yet more weaknesses in the opponents position.
------------------
--EvC Forum Administrator