|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 4936 days) Posts: 215 From: Brookfield, Wisconsin Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evolutionary Adaptation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
quote:No, a person in the poorer countries (where everyone goes barefoot and has hardened skin) still have children that has soft feet. Our ancestors mostly had barefeet and were more physicaly stronger and hard working than todays people. We are all still born soft and need to workout to be strong. quote:That could be because the mother was starving and didnt had enough nutrients to privide a normal sized baby. There are some short mothers though, who gives birth to larger babies, which also grow larger than their parents. quote:If God created the universe andevery atom of this universe. It would be possible for Him to change anything He wanted in science, wouldn't He? Read "Time Has an End" by, H. Camping for great evdence that the Bible is true and the word of God. You can read it online at Time Has An End
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
quote:There are many people who tries to bring peace to both sides by believing "Theistic-Evolution". They believe God created the "materials" and let evolution take over.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
quote:Yeah, pretty much trying to please both sides. But it doesn't work that way. If one is right then the other is wrong. Read "Time Has an End" by, H. Camping for great evdence that the Bible is true and the word of God. You can read it online at Time Has An End
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
Sure could, and if that were true, if GOD actually did do that, then we need to abandon science and return to magic.
We cant explain how God created the animals and planets. There's no science in that. So all we can say is God did it. He spoke it, but we dont know how it all happened, because He is so much greater than us we dont understand how He is. Read "Time Has an End" by, H. Camping for great evdence that the Bible is true and the word of God. You can read it online at Time Has An End
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
Welcome to the fray btw. Is that some microscope picture for your avatar?
The fray?Lol, yeah. It's a bubble in middle of being adjusted to the light on the camera. Read "Time Has an End" by, H. Camping for great evdence that the Bible is true and the word of God. You can read it online at Time Has An End
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
If you don't know how he did it, why are you ruling out that god did it throughselection with a filter of natural selection>?
I dont believe in evolution. Im a creationist. I believe the universe was created in 7 days, 13,000 years ago. (Ill get to how I got 13,000 years later on my own topic)So yeah, I dont believe in natural selection...actually against it. I was just reffering to Theistic-Evolutionists that believes in God and evolution and tries to tie the sides together. Read "Time Has an End" by, H. Camping for great evdence that the Bible is true and the word of God. You can read it online at Time Has An End
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
You didn't answer the question about truths vs spreading falsehoods.
We (cretionists) do not believe this is spreading falsehoods. As a matter of fact we think you (evolutionists) are. Thats what this forum is about, isnt it? You also have a logical fallacy above -- they can both be wrong, thus showing ONE to be wrong does not make the OTHER right. Enjoy.
Yes I know just because one is proven wrong then the other isn't right. But I meant if one (Evolution or creation) is right then the other is wrong. (has to be in this case) Read "Time Has an End" by, H. Camping for great evdence that the Bible is true and the word of God. You can read it online at Time Has An End
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
Ok let me just say, I believe in the biblical creation. But, evolution is no way part off the bible. I may even disagree in many creationists so dont say what other creationists say because I have my own belief. I believe the earth is 13,000 yrs old (11,013 BC to be exact), and the universe was created in 7 days by the word of God.
And that's what this forum is about, debating on the two topics, so dont just say you're right and we're wrong. That will go absolutley nowhere. Because in a few years, 2011, the Bible tells us the Lord will most likely return and the world will end. Then will you see the Bible is the word of God. Edited by AdminNosy, : Topic warning! Edited by Crue Knight, : Erasing AdminNosy's INSULTS when he edited my post.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
the Earth is 11,013 years old? nice number. How are fossils that are older then that explained? or did god create the fossils there, trying to trick us? Light that we see from other solar systems and other galexies has been in-transit for millions of years, did god create that to fool us too?
Everything you asked cannot be explained like 1, 2, 3. When the world ends, god will destroy everything, the earth and the billions of light-years of unused space just there with no purpose, as anything more then 13000 light years away could not be seen anyway? Sigh. Quite a thoery. The Debate is indeed wether you are wrong and we are right, but see, we have every privlage to do that. We can tell you you wrong wrong wrong, simple because this is a debate, and you have brought something to the table. I like to call it hot air, based on ... oh yes, absolutly nothing but the words of men from thousands of years ago at such a degree of hearsay that its a wonder people read it for truth, let alone believe it.
If you read other Creationists post or maybe this link, http://www.timehasanend.org/..._time_has_an_end_ch05.html#08 , it'll explain why dating methods used today gives us what we think as old fossils. How can you be sure they work anyway? Were you there to witness the fossil decaying for a long time? Why is it that when we dig a certain depth, then there is nothing but sedimentary rock? And light from other planets millions-billions of light years away could be seen because God made this universe mature, just as the first human, Adam was mature. You should know better we believe the Bible was inspired by God. BTW, weren't you in the Library at HeavenGames? I reconize your name. Read "Time Has an End" by, H. Camping for great evdence that the Bible is true and the word of God. You can read it online at Time Has An End
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
A couple of questions pops up when I think of the theory of natural selection:
If the theory of natural selection were true, and only the stronger and the most fitting organism would promote itself, but the weaker dies, then wouldn't the earth's inhabitants lead itself towards destruction? This means the strongers will kill the weakers then we will all die. If the theory of natural selection is true, wouldn't we be able to survive another "big bang"? Since we keep getting stronger and more complex, we would be able to survive (Or at least some animal would)another crash since the organisms were weaker before? Read "Time Has an End" by, H. Camping for great evdence that the Bible is true and the word of God. You can read it online at Time Has An End
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
That's "the organism better adapted to the current environment" that "promotes itself," or, rather, leaves offspring. Horseshoe crabs aren't known for their ferocity or cunning, but they survive and reproduce very nicely in their little niche. Tigers are famously fierce and strong, but as we take away their natural habitat, they'll all die out. "Strong" doesn't mean "fit" in biology.
But if thing get "better" or whatever...all other things will die out.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crue Knight Inactive Member |
Unless one species adapts better real slow and other species counter-adapt real slow. If I understand what you are saying, that is.
Maybe I should have said, stop their line of evolution. Like if all the monkeys died (including us). But it seems as if we would be the ones who is more intelligent, so we would, and has the capability to destroy many lines of evolution.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024