|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 60 (9209 total) |
| |
Skylink | |
Total: 919,486 Year: 6,743/9,624 Month: 83/238 Week: 0/83 Day: 0/24 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: A timeless God can exist. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PetVet2Be Inactive Member |
That is exactly the response I was expecting. Evolution has nothing to start with and in order to get around that you just say that the fact that you dont know where the original matter came from is irrevelant. Of course its relevant. Without the starting matter how could the matter that isnt there go bang? So the question still stands where did the original matter come from.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1598 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
Of course its relevant. suppose i am studying the history of automobile design. we're looking at all the shapes that chevies and fords go through, versus japanese cars, etc. is the formation of the universe relevant to the discussion? further, since this discussion is about the formation of the universe, is the history of automobile design relevant to the formation of the universe?
So the question still stands where did the original matter come from. and the answer to that question has nothing to do with evolution, at all.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PetVet2Be Inactive Member |
You are saying that what you believe is based on nothing. Evolution has no foundation. Now who is being unscientific?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6608 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
You are saying that what you believe is based on nothing. Evolution has no foundation. Now who is being unscientific? The starting point of the Theory Of Evolution is that life already exists. How it got there is of no interest or importance to the Theory Of Evolution. It is, of course, of great interest and importance as an area of study in its own right (called abiogenesis as I'm sure you know). Oops! Wrong Planet
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PetVet2Be Inactive Member |
Why then do text books teach the big bang as the beginning of the universe? Because if they do not they must accept God did it and the Bible already tells how God and they dont like how he did it so they have to come up with something to fill the gap. The only logical explination is that something or someone who is not bound by our natural laws and has always existed started life. Chance does not work for out of nothing came something is not scientific yet this is what evolutionists have to accept. This is why many Christians can be discredited. They compromised on their beliefs and threw out the first several chapters of their Bibles. If the beginning of the Bible is not true then the whole thing is unbelievable. So I propose the question: Do you believe God created it or that it all sprang from nothingness?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1598 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
Why then do text books teach the big bang as the beginning of the universe? big bang ≠ evolution. no matter what kent hovind told you. "evolution" is the variation of heritable features in a population from one generation to the next. "the theory of evolution" or colloqually "Evolution" with a capital e is the study of how that above fact has affected the history of the development of life on this planet. neither of these is related to the big bang. the theory of evolution is marginally related to abiogenesis, or the origin of life. but that is a separate field. astronomy and cosmology is even further removed. it is not a "catch-all" mythology designed to explain everything without a need for god.
Because if they do not they must accept God did it and the Bible already tells how God and they dont like how he did it so they have to come up with something to fill the gap. unfortunately, the bible is not a science textbook.
This is why many Christians can be discredited. They compromised on their beliefs and threw out the first several chapters of their Bibles. you've thrown out several chapters of your bible. if you'd like, in the appropriate forum, we can discuss which parts you ignore.
If the beginning of the Bible is not true then the whole thing is unbelievable. all-or-nothing fundamentalism is a dangerous thing, petvet. it costs many people their faith. Edited by arachnophilia, : typo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lfen Member (Idle past 4932 days) Posts: 2189 From: Oregon Joined: |
Have I been infected with an admin meme? I don't know how I find myself pondering if evolution or big bang has anything to do with the OP.
PetVet is new here and probably should be given some gentle instruction about staying on topic instead of being encouraged to jump into any topic in any thread. Isn't there a better thread for this discussion? Just a thought. lfen
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1598 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
yes, you are right. i was starting with the "religion in religion fora" and "science in science fora" but really, the whole damned thing is off topic.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MangyTiger Member (Idle past 6608 days) Posts: 989 From: Leicester, UK Joined: |
Do you believe God created it or that it all sprang from nothingness? I descibe my viewpoint on this as Triple-A - Apathetic Agnostic Atheist. To be more precise:
Oops! Wrong Planet
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3897 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
So the question still stands where did the original matter come from. Matter does not have to "come" from somewhere. There is no "conservation of matter" law. Just after the Big Bang there was no matter at all. Matter exists later when it can "condense" out of the matter fields.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1598 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
There is no "conservation of matter" law. ...yes there is. Conservation of mass - Wikipedia it's just not exactly precise. you can convert matter to energy, or example, in nuclear reactions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
pesto Member (Idle past 5842 days) Posts: 63 From: Chicago, IL Joined: |
the Bible already tells how God and they dont like how he did it so they have to come up with something to fill the gap.
It's interesting that the man who came up with the kernel of our current understanding of evolution was a Christian.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024