Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 48 (9216 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: KING IYK
Post Volume: Total: 920,716 Year: 1,038/6,935 Month: 319/719 Week: 107/204 Day: 27/12 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Darwin in the Genome
Admin
Director
Posts: 13140
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 124 of 185 (32605)
02-18-2003 6:24 PM


Please, everyone drop the ad hominems. Thanks!
------------------
--EvC Forum Administrator

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by PaulK, posted 02-19-2003 2:59 AM Admin has replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13140
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 130 of 185 (32666)
02-19-2003 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 127 by PaulK
02-19-2003 2:59 AM


PaulK writes:
I an sorry, but Peter Borger is an arrogant liar who substitutes imagination for knowledge. It is really hard to answer such a person without making highly critical remarks concerning his conduct.
I understand how you feel.
The moderator guidelines prohibit moderation of threads in which one participates, and since I'm participating in this discussion as Percy I am powerless here, so I only issued a general admonition.
In debates, some opponents pose bigger puzzles than others. Peter Borger appears to be a puzzle that evolutionists have not yet deciphered, and he makes decipherment more difficult because some of his very effective debating techniques cause distracting frustrations and require time-consuming replowing of old arguments.
If Peter Borger's views are incorrect then nailing this down is going to require more than simply calling him a liar. You're going to have to keep track of which points he's successfully made and which he hasn't. You're going to have to carefully note for him where he hasn't addressed the arguments. You're going to have to explain when his arguments do not make sense. You're going to have to point out when he has made unsupported assertions. And you're going to have to stay focused on a particular point until it is settled. In other words, it requires discipline. And I hope Peter Borger holds you, me Scott and everyone else to the same standards.
Did anyone think this was supposed to be fun?
I'm not claiming to have all the debate answers, but whether you find the above suggestions useful or not, I *do* think increased discipline is required.
------------------
--EvC Forum Administrator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 127 by PaulK, posted 02-19-2003 2:59 AM PaulK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by Adminnemooseus, posted 02-21-2003 10:27 PM Admin has not replied

Admin
Director
Posts: 13140
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 183 of 185 (34001)
03-09-2003 8:04 PM


Closing This Thread
In light of the inability of the participants to move the discussion forward, I've come to agree with Adminnimooseus's earlier observation that it may be time to close this thread.
------------------
--EvC Forum Administrator

Admin
Director
Posts: 13140
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 185 of 185 (34004)
03-09-2003 9:01 PM


Closing This Thread
Peter was able to post a reply after the thread was closed because he began the reply before it was closed. To repeat the earlier message, due to the inabilty of the participants to move the discussion forward, this thread is being closed.
------------------
--EvC Forum Administrator

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025