Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 58 (9173 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Neptune7
Post Volume: Total: 917,566 Year: 4,823/9,624 Month: 171/427 Week: 84/85 Day: 1/20 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General discussion of moderation procedures: The Consequtive Consecution Sequel
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1543 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 301 of 302 (320531)
06-11-2006 2:21 PM
Reply to: Message 299 by iano
06-11-2006 2:09 PM


Re: PEH closed
My comment: "your absence from the relevant thread" dealt with the objection that 3 posters made which simply denigrated John an/or his argument. That their comments are hollow is made manifest from their unwillingness to put their convictions to the test. Did one of them even attempt to gain entry to the Showcase PEH thread?
What would be the purpose of that? Davidson's ideas were put to the test, before you got here, and they failed. Open and shut.
Why should I bother to beg access to a limited thread just to satisfy your curiosity? If you want to read the refutations of the semi-meiotic "hypothesis", search the archives. None of the rest of us are under any obligation to revisit the past simply to assuage your curiosity.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 299 by iano, posted 06-11-2006 2:09 PM iano has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3977
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 302 of 302 (320537)
06-11-2006 2:38 PM
Reply to: Message 300 by iano
06-11-2006 2:12 PM


Re: Calling Percy: PEH petition thread closed:
I'm not Percy/Admin, but I am the next longest term admin at .
I agree with AdminJar's reasons for closing the topic in question.
I also agree with Crashfrog's comments of message 301.
My impression is that you are now being nothing much more than a royal pain in the ass. Drop it and get over it. Everyone else also drop it.
This part 6 of the "General discussion of moderation procedures" has passed 300 messages and will now be closed. The new next version is General discussion of moderation procedures - Part 7.
The various admins need to update their "signatures" yet again.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 300 by iano, posted 06-11-2006 2:12 PM iano has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024