If we are evolving, then it is really just a fight to the finish and the winner takes all. Survival of the fittest. But to suggest that it is 'wrong' to impose morality as many claim religion does, is itself an imposition of morality. The only difference is that one side of the debate actually knows what they're saying, and understands those implications.
I disagree that to restrict an imposition of morality is to impose morality in itself. The restriction being apparently told to the church not to teach a morality implies no morality.
Then you say Jesus declared, then Jesus answered. Schitzophrenia (sp)?
As to dancing to our DNA, i wouldn't describe it that way. Sure there are fundementals dictated by our DNA, but i believe that Society dictates our morals. An example: In the middle ages, kissing was a sign of extreme affection and madesty was at quite a high. Nowadays you have 8th graders going off and having pre-marital sex, and thats the norm. (maybe 8th graders is an exageration. High schoolers?) Society makes the morals and dictates whats acceptable.
-I believe in God, I just call it Nature
-One man with an imaginary friend is insane. a Million men with an imaginary friend is a religion.
-People must often be reminded that the bible did not arrive as a fax from heaven; it was written by men.
-Religion is the opiate of the masses