Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,922 Year: 4,179/9,624 Month: 1,050/974 Week: 9/368 Day: 9/11 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

interesting stuff:Sheldrake's morphogenetic field?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   interesting stuff:Sheldrake's morphogenetic field?
Son Goku
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 7 of 45 (296207)
03-17-2006 10:55 AM 		Reply to: Message 6 by EZscience
03-17-2006 7:35 AM

Re: Quantum mysticism
Barrow is co-author of The Anthropic Cosmological Principle that is a thought-provoking consideration of all the seemingly improbable mathematical coincidences of the physical world and a book widely hailed (or criticized) by science philosophers as 'scientific mysticism' at its most mathematically elegant.
Barrow's pop-science books land somewhere between the Brian Greene-type and the Michio Kaku type. They posses the well meaning "fun" of Greene's books and are a bit full of Kaku's mysticism. Although ultimately they're damaging to the public view of physics.
​
randman writes:
​
We see non-seperability or action at a distance with quantum entanglement so I think your claim of hidden EM channels being looney is just nonsense.
It is ridiculous though.
In fact it makes so little sense I'd find it difficult to criticise.
​
This message has been edited by Son Goku, 03-17-2006 10:56 AM
This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by EZscience, posted 03-17-2006 7:35 AM EZscience has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by EZscience, posted 03-17-2006 11:36 AM Son Goku has not replied
  
Son Goku
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 27 of 45 (296357)
03-17-2006 6:07 PM 		Reply to: Message 26 by randman
03-17-2006 4:16 PM

Re: note the following
agrees with Bearden, don't you? Not on everything, but Bearden is basically following Tesla's line
That couldn't be true. Most of the science Beardan is discussing (aside from being wrong) Tesla either didn't accept or didn't live to see.
​
randman, you've just turned this into a thread about how maligned against Nikola Tesla was.
However this doesn't impact what Bearden is saying.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by randman, posted 03-17-2006 4:16 PM randman has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024