Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,400 Year: 3,657/9,624 Month: 528/974 Week: 141/276 Day: 15/23 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Should the Bible contain the Old Testement?
ohnhai
Member (Idle past 5183 days)
Posts: 649
From: Melbourne, Australia
Joined: 11-17-2004


Message 1 of 5 (289688)
02-23-2006 2:50 AM


I had the impression that the New Testament was exactly that. A new set of rules that replaced the old set in entirety. If this indeed so; then why does the bible, still contain the Old Testament? Surely, as we have been given the second testament via Jesus then, for a Christian, the Old Testament should be meaningless.
One for Bible study I would guess

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminPhat, posted 02-24-2006 8:35 AM ohnhai has not replied
 Message 3 by AdminPhat, posted 03-04-2006 11:31 AM ohnhai has not replied

AdminPhat
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 5 (290024)
02-24-2006 8:35 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by ohnhai
02-23-2006 2:50 AM


Some Bibles are only the NT
Hello, ohnhai! I have seen many a Bible that only contains the New Testament.
  • Do you want to assert that the Old Testament is no longer a valid piece of religious literature?
  • How would you present your Bible Study? Bible Study is a forum for Christian and/or Jewish Believers who view the Bible as a philosophical/Theological faith based discussion.
    Accuracy/Innerrency may be a better fit for this, but Faith/Belief would be even better yet. Do get back to me and elaborate on the direction that you wish to go with this topic. Respond By March 7th
    This message has been edited by AdminPhat, 03-04-2006 09:31 AM

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 1 by ohnhai, posted 02-23-2006 2:50 AM ohnhai has not replied

    AdminPhat
    Inactive Member


    Message 3 of 5 (292080)
    03-04-2006 11:31 AM
    Reply to: Message 1 by ohnhai
    02-23-2006 2:50 AM


    Paging Ohnhai
    Whats up, Ohnhai? Still wanna pursue this topic? Read my suggestions and get back to me....


    GOT QUESTIONS? You may click these links for some feedback:
  • General discussion of moderation procedures
  • Thread Reopen Requests
  • Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
  • Forum Guidelines
    ***************************************
    New Members: to get an understanding of what makes great posts, check out:
  • "Post of the Month" Forum
    "DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU"
    AdminPhat

  • This message is a reply to:
     Message 1 by ohnhai, posted 02-23-2006 2:50 AM ohnhai has not replied

    Replies to this message:
     Message 4 by AdminTL, posted 03-04-2006 12:21 PM AdminPhat has not replied

    AdminTL
    Inactive Member


    Message 4 of 5 (292095)
    03-04-2006 12:21 PM
    Reply to: Message 3 by AdminPhat
    03-04-2006 11:31 AM


    Re: Paging Ohnhai
    AdminPhat, I haven't been active enough on this board to want to promote this topic on my own authority.
    However, I most definitely want to address this question, and I think the question is clear. If the New Covenant superceded the old, then why keep the old? It seems like a legitimate question, and I'd love to give my answer.

    This message is a reply to:
     Message 3 by AdminPhat, posted 03-04-2006 11:31 AM AdminPhat has not replied

    AdminChristian
    Inactive Member


    Message 5 of 5 (292110)
    03-04-2006 1:12 PM


    Thread copied to the Should the Bible contain the Old Testement? thread in the Bible Study forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

    Newer Topic | Older Topic
    Jump to:


    Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

    ™ Version 4.2
    Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024