'm missing how this isn't related to the topic at hand. My point in stating that I can't speak to the original intent, was to not speak for the person to which the comment I was replying to was intended.
The title of this thread is
Not the topic of this thread. The title is a quote from an article discussing a recent article in 'The Anatomical Record'.
What you are discussing has nothing to do with that article, if you think it does then please show me how.
If not then please stop posting on this thread.
Whether mutation can cause an increase in information, no matter how you define it, is not something which has any relevance at all to this work.
Please stop derailing this thread with discussions of information content, it is just as off topic as discussions of Dawkin's treatment at AIG. If you can't find an extant thread on these topics then propose a new one, but this is not a suitable thread for either.
If you aren't interested in discussing the paper that Randman's article concerns then you shouldn't be on this thread.
TTFN,
AW