mkolpin
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 65 of 304 (280956)
01-23-2006 1:44 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by Tusko
09-13-2005 10:07 AM
|
|
I don't believe it's possible to scientifically test the supernatural aspect of ID. However, the idea of irreducible complexity in cells is used by ID theorists as scientific evidence in support of a designer. Therefore, while a designer cannot actually be detected scientifically, certain parts of the ID theory are directly related with science and can be scientifically tested.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 1 by Tusko, posted 09-13-2005 10:07 AM | | Tusko has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 67 by AdminJar, posted 01-23-2006 1:48 PM | | mkolpin has not replied | | | Message 68 by PaulK, posted 01-23-2006 1:50 PM | | mkolpin has replied |
|
mkolpin
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 69 of 304 (281284)
01-24-2006 2:49 PM
|
Reply to: Message 68 by PaulK
01-23-2006 1:50 PM
|
|
Yes, I think there are scientific aspects that intelligent design theorists use to prove their point that can be scientifically tested. That does not mean that science can point to a designer. It just means that there are parts of the ID theory that are science-based and not directly related to the supernatural, although ID theorists will infer this.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 68 by PaulK, posted 01-23-2006 1:50 PM | | PaulK has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 70 by PaulK, posted 01-24-2006 2:58 PM | | mkolpin has not replied | | | Message 71 by ksparks, posted 01-24-2006 10:37 PM | | mkolpin has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2