Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   War in Iraq, is there a point?
Yaro
Member (Idle past 6526 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 166 of 308 (236054)
08-23-2005 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 161 by Tal
08-23-2005 12:58 PM


Re: Left v. Right B*ll Sh*t
Alright, now that we agree on that, give me some questions regarding the strategic or tactical situation in Iraq.
Ya sure. Earlier we came up with a figure of about 20,000 actuall fighting forces. While the number may seem small, it is deceptive two ways:
1) 20,000 fighters can do alot of dammage in a guerilla war. And the number does not indicate the support network of these insurgents. The info I posted cited much popular support for many of the groups involved.
Think about it like gang warfare. There may be only a small group of gang members who participate in violent action. Yet they have a large network of supporters etc.
2) The insurgency has been growing steadely. The 20,000 fighters is up from 5000 fighters just 2 years ago.
This insurgency, coupled with widespred opposition to american occupateion (the polls I cited spoke of over 50% of the populace) spells only disaster to me.
My question is, even if we get a constitution ratified and pull out tomorow, what's to guarrantee that Iraq will be a stable country? I guess, what's to prevent the cat leaving and the mice playing

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 12:58 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 2:29 PM Yaro has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4157 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 167 of 308 (236055)
08-23-2005 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 161 by Tal
08-23-2005 12:58 PM


Re: Left v. Right B*ll Sh*t
Here's a serious question - how do we a)stop the insurgents entering the country and b) combat those incountry?
My contacts (British service(wo)men in Iraq) tell me that people are entering the country at a steady rate and we don't seem to be making any headway at all.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 12:58 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 174 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 1:25 PM CK has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 168 of 308 (236056)
08-23-2005 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 164 by Tal
08-23-2005 1:06 PM


Re: Left v. Right B*ll Sh*t
Well, until they start amassing this vast army, I think we should concern ourselves with reality and stop invading countries on false intelligence. Those billion and a half men are going to need a fleet of ships, a great air force, a whole bunch of cruse missiles and the like in order to reach the Florida coast. At the moment they got nothing but home made bombs.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 1:06 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 176 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 1:27 PM robinrohan has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 169 of 308 (236058)
08-23-2005 1:16 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by FairWitness
08-23-2005 12:22 PM


Do you know American History?
Noriega was a thug & a drug kingpin. I regret to say I know little about Pinochet, but I do know that the USA does not go to war for selfish motives. We always have altruistic motives, it's always for the cause of freedom.
That's a nonsense statement and one you need to retract.
You do realize that Noriega became a drug lord with the help of the US?
What were the Altruistic Motives for the conquest of Florida?
Where were the Altruistic Motives in the case Cherokee Nation vs State of Georgia?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by FairWitness, posted 08-23-2005 12:22 PM FairWitness has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by FairWitness, posted 08-23-2005 1:19 PM jar has replied

FairWitness
Inactive Member


Message 170 of 308 (236061)
08-23-2005 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 157 by Chiroptera
08-23-2005 12:50 PM


Re: Left v. Right B*ll Sh*t
Boy, you are so wrong about the character of Americans. We are unique among the world's populations. What other nation on Earth says to its government, "Here take my tax dollars, raise a military to defend our freedom & while you're at it, defend democracy across the globe & we'll foot the bill for that, too. Whenever there's a natural disaster, send assistance immediately, even if the nation in need is our sworn enemy. Do not ever invade another land for the purpose of taking it over to steal its resources. Do so only to rescue its people or protect & restore it to its rightful citizenry."
HOw many aggressors have we repelled over the decades, then given the nations back to their people? What other nation on Earth does that? We have paid the bill for it all, too. You're dead wrong about who we are as a nation. You need to go back to school & study.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 157 by Chiroptera, posted 08-23-2005 12:50 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by Chiroptera, posted 08-23-2005 1:27 PM FairWitness has replied

FairWitness
Inactive Member


Message 171 of 308 (236063)
08-23-2005 1:19 PM
Reply to: Message 169 by jar
08-23-2005 1:16 PM


Re: Do you know American History?
Rubbish, rubbish & more rubbish. Peddle this baloney to someone else. I'm not buying & I'm not retracting one word.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 169 by jar, posted 08-23-2005 1:16 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 173 by jar, posted 08-23-2005 1:25 PM FairWitness has not replied

Yaro
Member (Idle past 6526 days)
Posts: 1797
Joined: 07-12-2003


Message 172 of 308 (236065)
08-23-2005 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by FairWitness
08-23-2005 1:08 PM


Re: Left v. Right B*ll Sh*t
What, precisely, is so dumb about supporting your country while it is at war?
My Govt. is not my country.
When our way of life is threatened, & it truly is, why would exercising your right to dissent & free speech to voice that dissent be the proper choice of a good citizen of any country?
Maybe I don't feel that our way of life is under any significant threat from Iraq. I may be wrong. I feel that there is still a looming terror threat eminating from many other countries other than Iraq.
If I feel this is the case, it is my DEUTY and my right to voice my opinion. My country NEEDS me, you, everyone, to do that when necissary.
Your country is need of your support & your help, not your complaining & your criticism.
I'm not complaining or critisising, I am being honest.
When you do that, the ENEMY is encouraged. What don't you get about that?
The ENEMY has a lot more to worry about.
While you have every right in this nation to do it, I'm saying you should choose not to exercise that right at this time.
My rights are inalienable. I can exercise them whenever I see fit.
If you cannot support the war effort, if you do not agree with the actions of the military & the President, fine, disagree, in private.
Say Dubya started a war with Canada and started putting people in concentration camps over here. And his justification for the war is that: "Canadians are too polite". Would you keep quiet about your opposition?
But in public, we must, as Americans, stick together until the fighting has ceased & we have prevailed.
No. We must behave as americans do and exercise/enjoy our liberties. To show the world that we are truely free, as we can freely question everything, even ourselves.
When public statements contrary to the mission are made, the enemy is emboldened, the war is prolonged, more soldiers die on both sides.
The enemy is currently in the middle of a desert, they don't have the time to log into the EVC.
It's counter to our best interests. Surely you know all of this, don't you?
Well, I know you feel this way, but think about it critically.
Your rights to free speech & freedom of expression are not more important than the lives of our soldiers, are they?
Yes they are actually, that's why they go and die for those rights.
Every time liberals open their mouths & criticize their country, they encourage the enemy, which results in the deaths of more Americans.
Well, do you have proof?
You don't do that if you care about your country & you care about its troops.
I do it precisely because I care. If I lose my rights, have they not died in vein?
Now, I repeat the question I started this post with, what's so dumb about supporting your country while it's at war?
I do. I don't support my govt.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by FairWitness, posted 08-23-2005 1:08 PM FairWitness has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 173 of 308 (236066)
08-23-2005 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by FairWitness
08-23-2005 1:19 PM


Re: Do you know American History?
Sorry but that's not how it works here. We try to deal with reality, not fanciful imagination.
I asked you two specific questions. Do you have an answer for either?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by FairWitness, posted 08-23-2005 1:19 PM FairWitness has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5707 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 174 of 308 (236067)
08-23-2005 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by CK
08-23-2005 1:10 PM


Re: Left v. Right B*ll Sh*t
Here's a serious question - how do we a)stop the insurgents entering the country and b) combat those incountry?
My contacts (British service(wo)men in Iraq) tell me that people are entering the country at a steady rate and we don't seem to be making any headway at all.
By combating insurgents, I presume you mean on a strategic level. The 1 line answer is that you have to give the insurgents that they can get their views across better through the political process.
First, let's take a look at what the insurgency is.
You have an insurgency with no vision, no base, limited popular support, fighting an elected government and committed Iraqis to the democratic process, and you have Iraqi security forces that are fighting and dying for their country every day.
Next, what is thier current effectiveness?
General Casey writes:
The general said the Iraqi insurgency is still capable of launching devastating attacks, but he says it is weaker than it was a few months ago thanks to continuing offensive operations by his troops and the new Iraqi army and police.
"In general terms, they are falling off and not effective," he said. "We took a look at the election attacks, because we said, 'the elections ought to tell us something about the strength of the enemy.' Well, we saw about 300 attacks [and] maybe 70 percent of those were ineffective."
General Casey says the insurgents launch between 50 and 60 attacks every day, but try to carry out three or four times as many. He says the insurgents are more often resorting to relatively ineffective methods, such as drive-by shootings and by firing weapons from far away. The general says the coalition has reduced the insurgency's effectiveness by capturing or killing a large number of what he described as "second tier" leaders.
How do you defeat it?
General Casey writes:
"That's not something that we're going to defeat militarily," General Casey said. "The people that are supporting and doing these attacks are going to hopefully be drawn into the political process. And that will take some of the air out of the insurgency. So it's a combination of the political, the military, the economic and the communications that's ultimately going to defeat this."
General Casey says the January 30 election helped in that process, but he was not willing to endorse comments made by other commanders that the election was a 'tipping point' in the fight for the hearts and minds of the Iraqi people.
You have to get past that tipping point on several issues: economic, political, military, before the insurgency will start losing recruits. The leaders will be as die hard as ever, but without recruits and the Iraqi Government hunting them down, they will lose their abilities to execute missions.
Borders
Big issue here, as it is in the United States. No easy answers. The first part is setting up and training the Iraqi Army and National Guard to be able to be the military muscle that the political arm can flex. It takes time to build these units. By that, I mean you can throw people together and teach them to fight, but Commisioned Officers and Non-Commissioned Officers can only be grown through time as the leadership potential of individuals emerge. That potential then has to be nurtured and educated to make effective tactical decisions.
In short, the borders are going to be a problem.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by CK, posted 08-23-2005 1:10 PM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by deerbreh, posted 08-23-2005 1:46 PM Tal has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 175 of 308 (236068)
08-23-2005 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 170 by FairWitness
08-23-2005 1:17 PM


Ah, so he's one of those!
quote:
We are unique among the world's populations.
Even the claims of uniqueness aren't particularly unique, I'm afraid.
-
quote:
What other nation on Earth says to its government....
Everyone says that.
-
quote:
HOw many aggressors have we repelled over the decades, then given the nations back to their people?
Actually, during the expansion west, the United States was the aggressor. And we never gave it back to the Native Americans, either.
-
quote:
You need to go back to school & study.
Actually, this all a matter of basic history that I did learn in school. I'm surprised that you seem unfamiliar with it. Were you homeschooled?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 170 by FairWitness, posted 08-23-2005 1:17 PM FairWitness has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 1:29 PM Chiroptera has replied
 Message 182 by FairWitness, posted 08-23-2005 1:51 PM Chiroptera has replied
 Message 185 by Faith, posted 08-23-2005 1:58 PM Chiroptera has replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5707 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 176 of 308 (236069)
08-23-2005 1:27 PM
Reply to: Message 168 by robinrohan
08-23-2005 1:15 PM


Re: Left v. Right B*ll Sh*t
At the moment they got nothing but home made bombs.
And if they get nuclear or biological weapons, do you think they would hesitate to blow up Tampa if they go the chance?

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 168 by robinrohan, posted 08-23-2005 1:15 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by jar, posted 08-23-2005 1:39 PM Tal has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5707 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 177 of 308 (236070)
08-23-2005 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by Chiroptera
08-23-2005 1:27 PM


Re: Ah, so he's one of those!
Actually, during the expansion west, the United States was the aggressor. And we never gave it back to the Native Americans, either.
Slight correction. They do have reservations and can pass their own laws.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by Chiroptera, posted 08-23-2005 1:27 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by Chiroptera, posted 08-23-2005 1:40 PM Tal has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 178 of 308 (236078)
08-23-2005 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by Tal
08-23-2005 1:27 PM


Opposing Terrorism
Tal
Please understand that those of us who oppose the current policies of the Administration are not saying we should not oppose terrorism. What we are saying is that the method being used is not effective and in fact is increasing the risk of terrorist attacks.
Tal writes:
And if they get nuclear or biological weapons, do you think they would hesitate to blow up Tampa if they go the chance?
That is a very great concern. The issue for many of us is based around that.
What is the best method for preventing non-Nation States from getting the means of destruction currently availabe only to Nation States?
Frankly, a nuclear weapon is not the biggest threat. If the terrorists were as smart as they seem to be, they would realize that far more damage could be done to the US with conventional methods and very small budgets than with a classic nuclear device.
But we need to realize that we do have limited resources. The question is how to best use those resources to get the greatest benefit.
No one is saying that terrorism should not be opposed. The debate is, or should be, on how to best use our limited resources.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 1:27 PM Tal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 211 by GDR, posted 08-23-2005 3:11 PM jar has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 179 of 308 (236079)
08-23-2005 1:40 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by Tal
08-23-2005 1:29 PM


Re: Ah, so he's one of those!
Hi Tal.
I would be more impressed if the reservations weren't such tiny portions of North America, usually located on lands considered economically marginal, and weren't managed by the US government "on behalf" of the natives.
It reminds me more of South Africa bantustans (only without even the pretense of independence) than an actual returning of territory wrongfully taken.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 1:29 PM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by Tal, posted 08-23-2005 1:44 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Tal
Member (Idle past 5707 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 180 of 308 (236083)
08-23-2005 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 179 by Chiroptera
08-23-2005 1:40 PM


Re: Ah, so he's one of those!
Chiro...didn't say I agreed with it, just pointing out that they do have their own land.

Tired of the opposite sex? Want to turn your favorite football player into a raging homsexual? Then purchase your Gay-Gene Cattle Prod! One Zap from the GGCP will turn the Gay Gene off or on at your whim. So if you want your wife to get some hot girl on girl action, the Gay-Gene Cattle Prod is for you! *not intended for use on children*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by Chiroptera, posted 08-23-2005 1:40 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024