Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Science vs Morality: 1998 Rind Study Controversy (evidence of harm/abuse/consent)
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 39 (235010)
08-20-2005 2:16 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Silent H
08-20-2005 1:50 PM


clarification
quote:
And that second thing is really not about harm, which is what I was talking about, and about practical methods for lawmaking.
Just to make sure that people are aware (and correct me if I am wrong): the authors of the study themselves take great pains to avoid any comments or conclusions about the moral and legal issues. They very explicitly state that they are dealing solely with the scientific (and, hence, the mental health) issues.
Now we may, of course, use the information in the study to try to come to informed opinions as to the moral and legal implications, but the authors explicitly state that this is outside the scope of their work.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Silent H, posted 08-20-2005 1:50 PM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024