|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Is there any indication of increased intellegence over time within the Human species? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
There was another thread, Message 1 that started out on Bones of Contention but where the issue of intellegence came up. I believe that the question is interesting enough for it's own thread.
First, I'm not sure there is a good definition of intellegence so as a working assumption I would describe intellegence as the capability to imagine a new way of performing a task. In this thread I'd like to ask several questions.
This message has been edited by jar, 08-05-2005 11:32 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
NT
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
well, using the definition I siggeszted (and defining intellegence was always one of the biggest issues) I'd split them into two groups
(bacterium, mimosa, jellyfish' snail) and (mouse, dog, chimpanzee, human). The split would come on the issue of problem solving. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
In the end, remember that when we look at fossils, we see more into ourselves than we do in our ancestors. I think that's a very important point. Knowledge has increased, but was the first person to chip an edge on a rock less intellegent than say, an atomic scientist? Was human success due to some increase in intellegence (once some threshold is passed) or to an increase in knowledge? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
or increased knowledge?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
It takes intelligence to invent better tools. Or where do you think the tools come from? Absolutely. Intellegence is needed. But does it take more intellegence to create the first variation or the subsequent improvements? Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Or could it be that the tools used by each culture were better suited to the individual applications and lifestyle?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
But if the Neanderthal tools were easier for the Neanderthals to aquire and served the purpose needed, were more of a swiss army knife, meet general needs tool than the specialized tools of the Cro-Magnon, I could make an argument that they were superior. Being heavier might not be a disadvantage if the users were not traveling and might even be an advantage with a more sedentary people.
In addition, even if the advantages you describe were fact, that does not show an increase in intellegence. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Was Einstein more intellegent than Newton?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I still don't see that as indicating an increase in intellegence. It could equally be serendipity, based on innovation. The Cro-Magnon made an innovative discovery, and those discoveries spread quickly because the Cro-Magnon were more mobile.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
No new ideas have really been thought of since the Enlightenment, Ancient Greece, Ancient Rome, spread of Buddhism, Islam, and Christianity, and the time of Jesus. The TOE, double-helix, theory of gravity, general relativity, psychology, antibiotics, rubic-cube. Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Not just umb luck, but need. If the Neanderthal tools met there needs there would be little incentive to change them. If, in addition, they were lower cost to produce, there would actually be a disincentive towards change.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I ran across this article recently that may point to objective evidence. I'll see if I can find some direct references.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
I'd like to have more than just a news article. I'm trying to find the original.
AbE: From the original article
For microcephalin, the new variant class emerged about 37,000 years ago and now shows up in about 70 percent of present-day humans. For ASPM, the new variant class arose about 5,800 years ago and now shows up in approximately 30 percent of today's humans. The wonderful thing to me is that we may be seeing a continuation. The fact that these changes appear to fairly recent implies that we are just at the beginning of the change. What might we see 10,000 years from now? This message has been edited by jar, 09-08-2005 11:46 PM Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024