Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,925 Year: 4,182/9,624 Month: 1,053/974 Week: 12/368 Day: 12/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ten Most Harmful Books of the 19th and 20th Centuries
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 45 (222330)
07-07-2005 10:06 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by bobbins
07-07-2005 12:41 AM


Mein Kampf is, perhaps, the one book on this list that I know espouses an ideology that I find repugnant. Yet I can't say that I find the book dangerous.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by bobbins, posted 07-07-2005 12:41 AM bobbins has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by mick, posted 07-07-2005 11:33 AM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 45 (222341)
07-07-2005 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by bobbins
07-07-2005 12:41 AM


What I find odd is the inclusion of the last book, which is one of Keyne's work. Some conservatives may not like Keynesian economic policies, but Keynes' ideas are pretty standard mainstream ideas. To list his book as one of the ten most dangerous really indicates just how extreme the compiler of this list really is.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by bobbins, posted 07-07-2005 12:41 AM bobbins has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Chiroptera, posted 07-07-2005 11:45 AM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 45 (222342)
07-07-2005 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Chiroptera
07-07-2005 11:42 AM


Oh my god! John Stuart Mill's On Liberty made "Honorable Mention". At least we now know these people aren't the libertarian wing of conservatism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Chiroptera, posted 07-07-2005 11:42 AM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 45 (222364)
07-07-2005 12:57 PM


I like their comment on Das Kapital:
[Marx] could not have predicted 21st Century America: a free, affluent society based on capitalism and representative government that people the world over envy and seek to emulate.
They shouldn't be so hard on poor Karl. I'm living at the beginning of the 21st century, and I can't make this prediction either. But we still have 95 years to go -- maybe it will come to pass.

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by jar, posted 07-07-2005 1:02 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 45 (222409)
07-07-2005 5:58 PM


I've just read their blurb on Keynes' book and found this gem:
FDR adopted the idea as U.S. policy, and the U.S. government now has a $2.6-trillion annual budget and an $8-trillion dollar debt.
Strange that they don't mention that the last president to balance the federal budget was that "liberal" Democrat Bill Clinton, while the current record deficits are being racked up by our most Keynesian president in history, GWB (with help from a Congress dominated by his party).

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by jar, posted 07-07-2005 6:39 PM Chiroptera has not replied
 Message 41 by gnojek, posted 07-11-2005 3:03 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 45 (222541)
07-08-2005 8:38 AM
Reply to: Message 22 by nator
07-08-2005 7:29 AM


Could be a case of kindred minds thinking alike.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by nator, posted 07-08-2005 7:29 AM nator has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 32 of 45 (222590)
07-08-2005 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by jar
07-08-2005 1:06 PM


Re: The list is a greater threat than the terrorists.
Indeed, regimes ban books because, ultimately, their policies and ideologies can't withstand scrutiny. I would say that if a society that cannot withstand scrutiny then it must be based on some falsehood or irrational ideology, in which case scrutiny and rational debate is all the more necessary.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by jar, posted 07-08-2005 1:06 PM jar has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 45 (222813)
07-09-2005 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by sidelined
07-09-2005 2:44 AM


Re: subtopic titles
That's Ned's point: you are having a conversation about what is appropriate for children to read while the subtitle of your posts reads "Re: The list is a greater threat than the terrorists."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by sidelined, posted 07-09-2005 2:44 AM sidelined has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by sidelined, posted 07-09-2005 9:22 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 45 (222982)
07-10-2005 4:51 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Max
07-10-2005 4:03 AM


It doesn't sound as if the book itself is dangerous. At a railroad crossing, it's not the bell and flashing lights that are dangerous.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Max, posted 07-10-2005 4:03 AM Max has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 45 (223167)
07-11-2005 3:06 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by gnojek
07-11-2005 3:03 PM


Man, I wish I said that!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by gnojek, posted 07-11-2005 3:03 PM gnojek has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 45 of 45 (223405)
07-12-2005 12:32 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by robinrohan
07-12-2005 10:51 AM


Re: George Eliot
I read The Mill on the Floss. I don't think that it is as bad as people are making out, but I agree that if that novel is typical of George Eliot's works then I don't why she is considered such a big deal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by robinrohan, posted 07-12-2005 10:51 AM robinrohan has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024