Earlier today I, for lack of a better term,
reprimanded Brad for posting commentary in the "Amicus briefs filed in Selman v Cobb County School District" "Links and Information" topic. His message was the previous there.
I think I agree with AdminJar's above comment. That said, the "L&I" forum is problematic. Why have information of any sort be posted, if it isn't to be debated? Well, "L&I" is a dumping ground for bare or near bare links. Perhaps the guideline there is (even if not specificly stated) like that of the "Post of the Month" forum topics.
Message 1 at the POTM topics include:
...and perhap a SHORT comment would also be nice. But, this is NOT a place to debate the referenced topic - so be nice.
A little debate tends to sometimes leak into "L&I" topics, and sometimes a bare link is appropriate at a debate forum topic. But the intent is to limit such things.
, like most everything, has "gray area" situations.
Adminnemooseus