Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,925 Year: 4,182/9,624 Month: 1,053/974 Week: 12/368 Day: 12/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Analyzing Intelligent Design {a structural construction of ID theory}
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 27 of 99 (206835)
05-10-2005 6:35 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Limbo
05-10-2005 6:16 PM


real life science
After all, we cant risk thinking of ANYTHING ID does as actual real-live 'science', right?
Wrong! If any real life science is done there is no risk at all it will open a whole new area of inquiry. Scientists (of all strips) LOVE that!
However, we still wait for some real science. As soon as evidence or results are produced that can stand up to rigorous scrutiny then lots of people will be glad to jump in. Fresh areas of research are the ones most likely to produce really interesting results.
It seems you simply do no understand the mind set of a real-life scientist (of any belief set). You have not the slightest clue about how their minds work.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Limbo, posted 05-10-2005 6:16 PM Limbo has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024