Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,903 Year: 4,160/9,624 Month: 1,031/974 Week: 358/286 Day: 1/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   No need for grunt work? *Societal Roles*
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 42 of 79 (204592)
05-03-2005 8:36 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by contracycle
04-27-2005 5:48 AM


i would argue that you have no idea what heavy lifting is if you think that four year olds and a few gallons of water are the heaviest things in the world. another product of today's lazy society.
further. four year olds should not be carried unless injured or asleep. they can walk.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by contracycle, posted 04-27-2005 5:48 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by contracycle, posted 05-03-2005 9:46 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 43 of 79 (204593)
05-03-2005 8:37 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by coffee_addict
04-28-2005 10:38 AM


yet another example of agriculture ruining everything lol. men get bored and start playing politics. it's like when we played house as little kids.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by coffee_addict, posted 04-28-2005 10:38 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 44 of 79 (204597)
05-03-2005 8:52 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by contracycle
05-03-2005 5:41 AM


if you are weak enough to be oppressed by someone else's religion...
mind your manners and respect the beliefs of the dead. if you don't hold them, fine. but people -who are just as important as you- did. when you dishonour another, you dishonour yourself.
iu swear. someday all those crazy feminists are gonna put all the religious people in chains along with the men.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by contracycle, posted 05-03-2005 5:41 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by contracycle, posted 05-03-2005 9:54 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 47 of 79 (204608)
05-03-2005 9:57 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by contracycle
05-03-2005 9:46 AM


most people i know can't walk 20 km per day. i imagine that if four year olds have to walk 20 km per day then they will. just like adults.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by contracycle, posted 05-03-2005 9:46 AM contracycle has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 48 of 79 (204609)
05-03-2005 10:03 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by contracycle
05-03-2005 9:54 AM


Thats empty sophistry. Tell me Brenna, do you also honour Nazism in the name of dead Nazi's? I suspect that you don't. I could point here to the incredible levels of bloodthirst in mesoamerican religion to make a moral point, but will not: there is still no basis for the absurd statement that if I dishonour the dead I dishonour myself.
That is at absolute best gross romanticism, and is certainly completely groundless.
how's this. i don't argue that nazis are the single worst thing to ever walk the planet unlike everyone else. i do not curse every nazi who ever walked as a demon and whatnot.
and everyone knows that i ascribe to quite a romanticized everything. call me an ideologue. and what is so groundless about considering that other people make up their minds about things for a reason and not simply because they aren't as intelligent as you?
Yes, clap the crazy feminists in irons, and the abolitionists too, we all know this democracy thing is only the subordination of the righteous to the unthinking mob.
oh come off it. i'm just saying that all these crazy broads are screaming about how awful hierarchy is when all they intend is to reverse it and put themselves on top. it's hypocrisy and it makes me nauseated.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by contracycle, posted 05-03-2005 9:54 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by contracycle, posted 05-03-2005 10:48 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 51 of 79 (204666)
05-03-2005 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by contracycle
05-03-2005 10:48 AM


yes i did read it and i've read quite a bit on matriarchal, matrilineal and matrilocal societies. i love your assumptions. guess what. not everyone who reads the same things as you jumps to the same conclusions you do.
i don't care how "not opressive" matriarchal societies are, it's still leadership by one sex. it's still a hierarchy, and it's still hypocritical and wrong.
i don't have to prove that feminists want to institute a matriarchal society, you said it yourself.
and frankly, i think abandoning a man and leaving him without a home is pretty opressive. and that's beside the fact that i don't think sexual freedom for anyone (as you describe it) is a good thing. but then i'm probably the only non fundie who thinks that.
matrilocal only means that the family lives where the mother's family lives... even the hebrews started out matrilocal. matrilocal doesn't have anything to do with this.tons of american indian tribes are matrilocal. congratulations.
moreover, i'd argue that your discussion of the evils of patriarchal societies are exaggerated. while i really don't feel like bothering to find it, i'm sure there are examples of patriarchal societies which are even less opressive than your dear little pet nations of matriarchs.
oh yes. and these crazy broads? i don't afford them any respect because they're all alive. except, i'm sure, there were some killed at kent state or some other protest and maybe some who did too much drugs during the late sixties and early seventies. you know. just like everyone else.
i'm tired of your self-righteous condemnation of everyone who doesn't agree with you. i hate everyone. you only hate people who call you on your hypocrisy.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by contracycle, posted 05-03-2005 10:48 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by mick, posted 05-03-2005 2:16 PM macaroniandcheese has replied
 Message 53 by nator, posted 05-03-2005 3:08 PM macaroniandcheese has replied
 Message 56 by contracycle, posted 05-04-2005 4:18 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 54 of 79 (204749)
05-03-2005 6:57 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by nator
05-03-2005 3:08 PM


if nothing else, i'm talking about contracycle. he seems to advocate them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by nator, posted 05-03-2005 3:08 PM nator has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 55 of 79 (204750)
05-03-2005 6:57 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by mick
05-03-2005 2:16 PM


yeah i'm sure. he just really pisses me off.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by mick, posted 05-03-2005 2:16 PM mick has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 57 of 79 (204898)
05-04-2005 8:09 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by contracycle
05-04-2005 4:18 AM


look. all i said was that claiming that women are the ones that have always done the heavy lifting was a stupid remark. and then you went off on me. leave me alone i don't care to prove to you the fact that i find your ideas to be wrong because i'm simply not interested in discussing it anymore ever. i've investigated it before and i didn't think it was a correct interpretation of the truth. i don't have to prove to you my thought process or how much i read or anything. i'm not debating the ideology, i'm debating the fact that you make claims and then double back on them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by contracycle, posted 05-04-2005 4:18 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by contracycle, posted 05-04-2005 10:01 AM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3957 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 60 of 79 (204921)
05-04-2005 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by contracycle
05-04-2005 10:01 AM


But thats impossible to DISCUSS because as soon as you are contradicted you throw a temper tantrum; it seems to me you do everything in your power to avoid having to actually support the nonsense you spout.
kinda like you
have a nice day
This message has been edited by brennakimi, 05-06-2005 06:55 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by contracycle, posted 05-04-2005 10:01 AM contracycle has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024