SIMPLE Astronomical Evidence Supports the Bible

Did it ever occur to you that the old astrologer didn't own a decent pair of sunglasses?Try it yourself. Watch Venus until you think it has disappeared into the sun and then compare your results with those on the clay tablet. And then, check the official figures and see how far off you are.You are such an extremist! On the one hand you need bare-eyeball, Bronze Age observations to support your 'theory' of astronomy; and on the other hand: you need an Earth Orbiting Telescope to support your view of the Bronze Age Bible. Great range. Too bad it is so far off target. OR ... It shows that the ancients didn't have sunglasses, or telescopes, or accurate clocks, or automatic calculators, or Columbian coffee, or toilet paper ... (I digress).db

---

Theology is the science of Dominion.
- - - My God is your god's Boss - - -

You say "our" as if you own it too.Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't your 'first principle' require the existence of an invisible guy? And if that is not enough, this invisible guy has a son. And if that isn't enough there is also a 'Ghost.' Three invisible guys. And if that isn't enough there are millions, yeah billions of invisible angels and demons all of whom are required to support and protect your first principle. Invisible things invented to assert a 'theory' which cannot be proven.Sound familiar?db

It's been a long time since I read him, but I too was wondering whether Immauel had read that same cuneiform tablet.db

This assertion has been rebutted to good effect but you seem unable to comprehend your error. Repeating the assertion does not strengthen its appeal.At any rate, it is clear that your own philosophy cannot explain much of anything without invoking deity (an invisible, undetectable thing). Why would you do that? Is that why you believe? Because it is easier? That's foolishness isn't it? Of course it is.

---

Theology is the science of Dominion.
- - - My God is your god's Boss - - -