Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,923 Year: 4,180/9,624 Month: 1,051/974 Week: 10/368 Day: 10/11 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Thread Reopen Requests
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 191 of 305 (198404)
04-11-2005 9:14 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by Brad McFall
04-11-2005 8:45 PM


Re: Irrefutable mike strikes
Thanks Brad. I'm glad of your interest, and it's good to hear from you.
Pink S writes:
You are making some kind of assumption that in order for the food chain to exist as it is now, it must have been originally set up that way - this is simply not the case.
That's a big strawman. As said the food chain could adapt that by one specie dying off, God would replace the animal into the available space, so the food chain would evolve but not the organisms. Call it equivocating a baramin,
And he is assuming that because he sees speciation today, they've always been speciating even from abiogenesis, while also assuming Abiogenesis is true.
If the first species was able to happen, then why would it need to speciate? Why would it adapt beyond it's baramin category? Ofcourse - none do observably. From niche to niche or from nil to nil I think I will choose a designer. The mind is there anyway! Food chains can't just happen, one part (species) of the sytem will always need his counterpart. Do u agrre/disagree Brad?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Brad McFall, posted 04-11-2005 8:45 PM Brad McFall has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 192 by AdminJar, posted 04-11-2005 9:32 PM mike the wiz has not replied
 Message 193 by Brad McFall, posted 04-11-2005 9:34 PM mike the wiz has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024