Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,810 Year: 3,067/9,624 Month: 912/1,588 Week: 95/223 Day: 6/17 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   March, 2005, Posts of the Month
JonF
Member (Idle past 167 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 31 of 36 (194010)
03-24-2005 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by nator
03-20-2005 1:56 PM


Re: Percy at "Is Evolutionist Disparagement of Creationism Justified?"
Name: Percy
Forum:Is it Science?
Thread:Is Evolutionist Disparagement of Creationism Justified?
Message 227
One of the best I've ever seen on why creationism isn't science, and what science really is. Some really good stuff throughout this thread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by nator, posted 03-20-2005 1:56 PM nator has not replied

bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5013 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 32 of 36 (195158)
03-29-2005 9:32 AM


Evolving Bicycles (RAZD)
Name: RAZD
Forum: Intelligent Design
Thread: IC challenge: Evolve a bicycle into a motorcycle!
Post: 58
A clever "evolutionary path" to counter to the claim that it is impossible to evolve from a bicycle to motorcycle. Apparenlty just because Behe isn't clever enough to do it doesn't mean RAZD isn't.
This message has been edited by bob_gray, 03-29-2005 09:32 AM
{Fixed link so that it would work for everone - Adminnemooseus}
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 03-29-2005 02:45 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by arachnophilia, posted 03-29-2005 10:49 AM bob_gray has not replied

arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1343 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 33 of 36 (195169)
03-29-2005 10:49 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by bob_gray
03-29-2005 9:32 AM


Re: Evolving Bicycles (RAZD)
i was waiting for someone to do that.
i'll second that one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by bob_gray, posted 03-29-2005 9:32 AM bob_gray has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8996
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 34 of 36 (195681)
03-31-2005 8:42 AM


Holmes on Epistemology
Message 6
It is posts like this that help me to remember what the big word means.
I think he has made clear an important point (which I also happen to agree with).

pink sasquatch
Member (Idle past 6022 days)
Posts: 1567
Joined: 06-10-2004


Message 35 of 36 (195736)
03-31-2005 12:52 PM


mike the whiz shocks and astounds
Name: mike the whiz
Forum:Is it Science?
Thread: Faith no more (at least not in scientific knowledge?)
Message: #5
After many recent frustrating arguments over the scientific nature of ID, it is refreshing to see an IDist honestly admit that ID is more in the realm of philosophy and faith than that of science:
BUT, Intelligent design for me, I'm going to say is not science. Maybe I'm just honest but I just don't think it is. ID deals with science, which is an entirely different thing.

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by mike the wiz, posted 03-31-2005 1:37 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4752
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 36 of 36 (195741)
03-31-2005 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by pink sasquatch
03-31-2005 12:52 PM


Re: mike the whiz shocks and astounds
Thanks Pink Sasquatch, this is most unexpected. Good sport.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by pink sasquatch, posted 03-31-2005 12:52 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024