daaaaBEAR writes:
The first response would be to stick to reasoning that only allows for natural happenings. The other response would be to accept that science cannot explain the whole realm of everything in our universe and that there is some higher, nontangible power (God, Satan, Buddha, etc...lets not get into details) .
The first part of your statement ("science cannot explain the whole realm of everything in our universe") doesn't necessitate the second ("there is some higher, nontangible power .").
Maybe you should have left it at "The other response would be to accept that
current science cannot explain the whole realm of everything in our universe.".
"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."
™ Version 4.2