Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   hormones and receptors - what came first?
PerfectDeath
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 13 (182171)
01-31-2005 10:16 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by crashfrog
01-31-2005 9:30 PM


replacement.
when i read this i wondered the same thing. "which did come first?"
but as you explained now i can understand it.
it's like enzymes: how did the first enzyme form. because enzymes are catalysts heat and time were the only things to help break things down so a structure that could take the place of that catalyst would be very usefull. so early receptors would have reacted to something in the environment and eventually a replacement was produced.
but so a glucose molecule, heat, or sumthing like that might wave been the catalysts?
and nice neji avatar caligola2

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by crashfrog, posted 01-31-2005 9:30 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024