Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How do you view the bible?
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 14 (18043)
09-23-2002 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by nos482
09-22-2002 1:58 PM


I think the bible should be regarded as one of the great works of literature. Sure it has some neat things to live life by.
I believe that most people today, take what they like and leave the rest. I do not believe that there is any Christain who will take the bible literally or takes it seriously. Even, I do not take any book 100% by faith.
Ahhh, new paragraph. I believe that they have to take it on faith. Taking something on faith is much different from taking it seriously. Sure I have faith in gravity, but if I go and jump off a building, obviously I did not take it seriously. And I think, many Christains do that in their regards to the bible.
They sure are quick to defend a book that they do not live up too. Does not make sense.
In my life, I think it is important to have read it at one time. Take what you like and discard the rest. We have Christains doing this, are they not supposed to be the example? Then let us follow their example[shudders].
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nos482, posted 09-22-2002 1:58 PM nos482 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by gene90, posted 09-23-2002 10:39 PM acmhttu001_2006 has replied

  
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 14 (18181)
09-24-2002 11:15 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by gene90
09-23-2002 10:39 PM


"I think the bible should be regarded as one of the great works of literature."
What else would it be? It is not science nor anything but a work of literature. I have a few sources to back this up, but really do not want to be searching tonight when I am on limited time.
"Sure it has some neat things to live life by.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contingent upon interpretation. But lots of other works have "neat things" in them. "
Sure, but that was not the point I was making based off of interpretation. Why is the bible any different?
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I do not believe that there is any Christain who will take the bible literally or takes it seriously.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This premise is easily proven wrong.
Prove it. I have never met a 100% Christain. Is there anyone out there that lives perfectly or adheres to the moral code as they should at all time? Nope. Did not think so. If it is so easily proven wrong, where it the proof?
"The Answers in Genesis Statement of Faith The Bible is the written Word of God. It is divinely inspired and inerrant throughout. It is the supreme authority in all matters of faith and conduct. Its assertions are factually true in all the original autographs."
Okay, so we have a religious organization that would state the bible is true. Big deal, what about the rest of the world. We accept things as true as the consensus of the populations defines it to be. The bible cannot be proven to be true nor can it be proven false, one must either believe in it or not. One can take any thing and believe it, if they wish to believe it. Happens all of the time.
"ICR Tenets of Biblical Creationism The Bible, consisting of the thirty-nine canonical books of the Old Testament and the twenty-seven canonical books of the New Testament, is the divinely-inspired revelation of the Creator to man. Its unique, plenary, verbal inspiration guarantees that these writings, as originally and miraculously given, are infallible and completely authoritative on all matters with which they deal, free from error of any sort, scientific and historical as well as moral and theological"
Maybe the bible was infallible at one time, but over the years. Do not think so. I would not believe in a biology book older than 20 years much less older than 100 years. If the bible were written when it said it was, then I have no faith in something that old. The amoung of truth that would still exist in it, would not be much compared to the amount of truth contained in a 100 year biology book
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by gene90, posted 09-23-2002 10:39 PM gene90 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by gene90, posted 10-01-2002 1:01 AM acmhttu001_2006 has replied
 Message 9 by gene90, posted 10-01-2002 1:02 AM acmhttu001_2006 has replied

  
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 14 (18869)
10-02-2002 12:30 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by gene90
10-01-2002 1:01 AM


And how is the statement errouneous, if not intrepreted wrong.
AGAIN, ANOTHER TIME THE POINT IS DRIVEN INTO THE GROUND.
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by gene90, posted 10-01-2002 1:01 AM gene90 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by gene90, posted 10-05-2002 5:05 PM acmhttu001_2006 has not replied

  
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 14 (18870)
10-02-2002 12:31 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by gene90
10-01-2002 1:02 AM


Ahhh,
But there is logic in that argument. You would have to be blind to not see it.
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by gene90, posted 10-01-2002 1:02 AM gene90 has not replied

  
acmhttu001_2006
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 14 (19043)
10-03-2002 11:07 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Jeff
10-03-2002 10:26 PM


Jeff,
Great post. I was laughing all the way through it. Keep posting these. And I love your definition of freedom from religions.
Hope to see more of your posts around here.
------------------
Anne C. McGuire
Cell and Molecular, Mathematics, Piano and Vocal Performance Majors
Chemistry and Physics minors
Thanks and have a nice day

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Jeff, posted 10-03-2002 10:26 PM Jeff has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024