Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dating in Hawaii
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 23 (174883)
01-07-2005 8:44 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Harlequin
01-06-2005 8:35 PM


Great post Harlequin. I also started a post on this very topic a while back (YEC Challenge: Hawaiian Islands).
In addition to the horizontal movement of the plate, the islands are also subsiding. In fact, seamounts thousands of kilometers away from the Big Island have submerged coral reefs. These reefs can be 50 meters underwater. Coral, if it is to survive, can only be in 1-2 meters of water. The depth of these dead coral reefs also correlates with the measured subsidence of the Hawaiian islands.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Harlequin, posted 01-06-2005 8:35 PM Harlequin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by RAZD, posted 01-07-2005 9:34 PM Loudmouth has not replied
 Message 7 by TrueCreation, posted 01-07-2005 9:53 PM Loudmouth has not replied
 Message 13 by Coragyps, posted 01-09-2005 8:35 PM Loudmouth has not replied

  
Loudmouth
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 23 (175506)
01-10-2005 12:55 PM


Thank you all for the corrections on coral depth. Marine biology is not my strong suit, so thanks for showing the errors of my ways.
What I should have said is that the SPECIES of coral skeletons found in deep water on these seamounts is consistent with gradual subsidence. In addition, U/Th dating of the coral correlates with this gradual subsidence (and against a young earth). Is that better?

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024