[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
[B]^ There is debate about quasars but this doesn't apply to galaxies.
Could your friend also be a little 'selective' I wonder?
The only bias in data selection that could have helped Tifft et al is that they selected them on the basis that they gave quantized results. Nobody is accusing Tifft et al of fraud.
I suspect that Napier et al only used the subset of data with very accuate redshifts. I like that kind of selectivity. The quantization is very fine. They got quantization with very high statistical significance for their subset of galaxies. The statistical significance is the key to this.
Only someone with an agenda would 'hope' that this result will 'go away' after analysis of more data.
[/QUOTE]
JM: I doubt it. This is in his arena of expertise, so I respect his opinion on the matter. As usual, creationist's eschew arguing in the scientific literature in favor of preaching to the masses by leaving out critical information. Effective, but very poor science.
Cheers
Joe Meert