No, I think that is the definition of Agnosticism.
Athieism, from everything I have read, says that there is no supernatural and could never be, not that we have no evidence for it so we don't know if it exists or not.
However, I guess I could be considered a "Strong Agnostic/Weak Athiest" by the second definition below.
Page not found - American Atheists
Atheism is based upon a materialist philosophy, which holds that nothing exists but natural phenomena. There are no supernatural
forces or entities, nor can there be any.
NOT AVAILABLE - FreeServers
An agnostic is a person who does not
know if a god or gods exist. An agnostic who also believes that it is impossible to know whether or not gods exist is a strong agnostic, otherwise he or she is a weak agnostic.
An atheist is someone who does not
believe in the existence of a god or gods. An atheist who actively believes that gods do not exist is a strong atheist, while an atheist that merely lacks belief in gods is a weak atheist. Many people who identify themselves as agnostics are also weak atheists. Note that since it is perfectly consistent to hold the position that the evidence for the existence or nonexistence of gods is not entirely conclusive (so knowledge is not possible) but points heavily towards the nonexistence of any gods (so a tentative belief in the nonexistence of gods is justified), it is possible to simultaneously be a strong agnostic and a strong atheist.
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 11-02-2004 07:07 PM