Joe, had the/any "thesis" gotten beyond an either/or position?? Let us admit any and all arguments. I have broadcast the idea that indeed there are only two-just-so stories with respect to human bio-change for if I open up a pale of Panbiogeography and Catholicism I am immediately defending Derrida agaisnt relativist slants which is not the end I need to be on when Derrida finally comes to His own text. And now I have a visualizable ablity to support my inscription even if I use Derrida's work to extend the description.
Do you then imply that a "deconstruction" never hangs together?? IF so then I would be able to conclude that you reason NOT from what HM Morris said to me that will continue to divide EVEN the DIFFERANCE (ie no matter the Freud applied) as creation science is about science even if it also belives in creationsm. B- Russel would agree on belief but again this is not what I am trying to no longer ask Derrida. It was not justified philosophically to remove a belief in Kant simply becasue physiological knowledge enabled some abstract inclination in this direction hence just so, but transimssion genetics has brought out that physiological genetics needs excatly what on this thinking Russel denied to math and geometry that Derrida has in Husserl time or elsewhere acutally been able to distance himself from and likely may provided the model time to carry out bio-change calculations even socially supportable from and just so again I ask, how do you mean that these two world view in the West to not hang together. I may have a carnal mind but I also have the ability to repent.
™ Version 4.2