I have to admit that I lack much of a formal education. What little education I do have, seems to have come through serendipity.
As an example, as a child I loved the encyclopedias. I would find a sudden interest in Butterflies. So down came Volume B and in I would dive. As I searched for Butterflies I came across Battles.
Battles led to trying to figure out who Wellington was and why Napolean was fighting which led to Moscow and the Winter Retreat and Lithuanian History which made me wonder why Latvia and Lithuania were not on my modern maps which led to what the Soviet Union was and who Joseph Stalin was and where did Trotsky go and why did he settle in Mexico and who was Diego Rivera and...
But today, that would not happen. Today, I would simply enter
Butterflies and the electronic equivalent of my dogeared encyclopedia would take me straight to...
Butterflies. I would just bypass all that other stuff and go straight to the answer.
But is that good?
Does the modern electronic equivalent of the encyclopedia only assure us that all we know is what we knew we needed to know?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion