Gotta love the quality of these links that these quality scientists give to their work:
http://education.vsnl.com/sankhyakarika/http://www.kolbecenter.org/http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/Yahoohttp://www.antidogma.ru/http://www.eugenesittampalam.com/ (see the link for anti-gravity at
http://www.beardmuseum.com/ses/AntiGravity.htm)
(etc - and these are just the people who *posted* their links!)
To some of these sorts of people, the Gaia Hypothesis would seem too mainstream. Lets look at some of their quality, applicable positions:
"Independent researcher" (lots and lots of these!)
"US Naval Sea Systems Command (ret.)"
"Engineering consultant, Sri Lanka"
(etc)
The companies are *almost always* not applicable at all:
Kaz group -The MITRE Corporationhttp://superconix.com/(etc)
Of the names that are from universities, the vast majority are not from applicable fields:
Tom Walther: Senior programmer and systems analyst
Michael A. Duguay: Electrical engineering and data processing
Jonathan Chambers: Postgraduate psychology research student
(etc)
Several of them don't show up in faculty listings for their claimed universities. Several of them can't even be found on the net outside this list.
This list is a complete joke. Very few of these people are even in remotely related fields. Perhaps one in 40 of these people is in a position to accurately comment about the accuracy of the big bang.
In short, this list isn't worth the paper it's written on (for which it isn't written on any)