Thanks for the link. If you come across any information explaining how a paper promoting standard ID theory came to be included in a peer-reviewed journal, that would be even more interesting. One would think that the peers conducting the review would have easily detected every single problem noted in the review, and probably many more, as well as the sheer unscientific nature of the approach. Methinks the peers need reviewing.
I was unable to find out much on my own. From
http://apt.allenpress.com/aptonline/?request=get-moreinfo..., this is about the journal:
The Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington is a quarterly publication consisting of articles focusing on systematic biology, taxonomy, biogeography, and phylogenetic studies. Issues also include news of interest to society members.
And this about the society itself:
The Biological Society of Washington, founded in 1880, is a world-wide organization of nearly 250 people who have an interest in biological systematics and taxonomy. The Society publishes a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, and holds an annual meeting.
--Percy
™ Version 4.2
