Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   New Book: Kerry ‘Unfit for Command’
johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5621 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 361 of 612 (137719)
08-28-2004 7:50 PM
Reply to: Message 359 by Chiroptera
08-28-2004 7:00 PM


Jefferson was referring to the bill of rights
Chiroptera, I find it interesting it may or may not be in the Constitution, apparently Thomas Jefferson, declared this message to all the world, that God is the author of those rights (implying the bill of rights), and not president, King, nor supreme court justice abridge those rights, etc...
P.S. I sure hope your wrong that those rights can be amended out of the constitution, etc...The right to bear arms, to believe in God, to own property, freedom of speech, etc...
http://www.dreamwater.com/raferty/pr_rights.html
It was upon this same rock solid conviction that Thomas Jefferson declared to all the world:
"We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness [the right and control of property]. "
That is, since God is the author of our Rights - no King or President, no House of Lords or Senate, no House of Commons or House of Representative, no Supreme Court or unelected bureaucrat, can ever abridge those rights.
This message has been edited by whatever, 08-28-2004 06:53 PM
This message has been edited by whatever, 08-28-2004 06:58 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 359 by Chiroptera, posted 08-28-2004 7:00 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 362 by jar, posted 08-28-2004 8:06 PM johnfolton has replied
 Message 363 by Chiroptera, posted 08-28-2004 8:19 PM johnfolton has not replied
 Message 364 by RAZD, posted 08-28-2004 8:48 PM johnfolton has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 362 of 612 (137720)
08-28-2004 8:06 PM
Reply to: Message 361 by johnfolton
08-28-2004 7:50 PM


Re: Jefferson was referring to the bill of rights
You do understand that the Creator that Jefferson was speaking of was not the Christian God. And that Jefferson, in particular, wanted to make sure that religion played no part in government.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 361 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 7:50 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 368 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 9:13 PM jar has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 363 of 612 (137722)
08-28-2004 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 361 by johnfolton
08-28-2004 7:50 PM


Re: Jefferson was referring to the bill of rights
Well, whatever, here is the text of Article V of the U.S. Constitution:
Article V
The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.
Do you see any restrictions as to how amendments can be affected?
As far as Thomas Jefferson, do you realize that his god was the deist god? Jefferson did not believe in the Christian God. At the beginning of the Declaration of Independence is the line:
It becomes necessary...to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them....
To someone who knows a little bit about the philosophy of the Enlightenment, the phase "Nature's God" is a tip off that they are not appealing to the Christian God. Notice how "the laws of nature" are given equal billing. At the end, we have the phrase
And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Again, in terms of the Enlightnment, this call on "Providence" is another way of avoiding calling on the Christian God.
IF you still aren't convinced, Thomas Jefferson rewrote the Bible, removing the miracles and divinity of Jesus, and the supernatural elements. No, Jefferson certainly was not a believer in Christianity. In his view, human rights were an inalienable part of what it is to be human, but as a natural part of the human constitution, not something granted divinely.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 361 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 7:50 PM johnfolton has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 365 by RAZD, posted 08-28-2004 8:52 PM Chiroptera has replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 364 of 612 (137726)
08-28-2004 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 361 by johnfolton
08-28-2004 7:50 PM


Re: Jefferson was referring to the bill of rights
WHOA BOY!
Where do you get off adding "[the right and control of property]" to the Declaration of Independence? IT AINT THERE!
There are only 3 rights listed as unalienable: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. PERIOD. The right to equality is given as "self evident" -- logically derived. The right of the people to abolish the government when it becomes destructive comes from the removal of the consent of the governed, ie from the people:
http://www.archives.gov/...rters/declaration_transcript.html
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it
All other rights, such as those in the "Bill of RIGHTS" (first ten amendments) are established by the government of the people, by the people, for the people. The constitution is specific and has no reference to god or religion other than to say it doesn't mix with government (separation of church and state).
Obviously such constitutional rights can be changed (and added to and subtracted from) by later constitutional amendments. The right of women to vote is one, civil rights is another.
Notice that these additional rights that expand the legal rights of all Americans are brought to you courtesy of the liberals. I have yet to figure out how expanded rights for all reduces or takes away our rights, but then the logic of your positions are dubious at best.
Also notice that the one document that has reduced our rights is the so-called "Patriot" act brought to you by the neocon administration, and it had to be toned down until it was acceptable to enough conservatives to pass.
Finally, the Declaration of Independence is not a law or a legal document, nor does it form a basis for laws. It is just a Declaration, signed by a few men (farsighted and courageous men).
ps - Notice that the god that is referred to in the Declaration of Independence is the "natural god" of "natural laws" -- the opening paragraph is:
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
Care to hazard a guess what god was being referred to there?
Do TRY to get it right, eh?

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 361 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 7:50 PM johnfolton has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 365 of 612 (137727)
08-28-2004 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 363 by Chiroptera
08-28-2004 8:19 PM


Re: Jefferson was referring to the bill of rights
aww ya gave it away. Does what ever consider that he may be way off base?
heh

This message is a reply to:
 Message 363 by Chiroptera, posted 08-28-2004 8:19 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 373 by Chiroptera, posted 08-28-2004 10:56 PM RAZD has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 366 of 612 (137732)
08-28-2004 8:59 PM
Reply to: Message 357 by johnfolton
08-28-2004 6:45 PM


Re:
Whatever, is it more easy or less easy for the government to wiretap your phones without probably cause before GWB was president or after?
Did the government have the right to detain you indefinitely without due process before GWB was president or after?
Did the government have the right to arrest you for reading certain books before GWB was president or after?
quote:
...The bottom line Kerry will have to increase taxes,
No shit.
It's called a huge TRADE DEFICIT and a huge NATIONAL DEBT.
GWB inherited a large SURPLUS that he completely squandered.
Also, his tax cut RAISES the tax burden upon the middle class, and LOWERS the tax burden for the weathiest Americans.
Are you a millionaire, Whatever?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 357 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 6:45 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 370 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 9:38 PM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 367 of 612 (137737)
08-28-2004 9:05 PM
Reply to: Message 360 by johnfolton
08-28-2004 7:28 PM


Re:
It's "tortured", not "torchered".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 360 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 7:28 PM johnfolton has not replied

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5621 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 368 of 612 (137745)
08-28-2004 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 362 by jar
08-28-2004 8:06 PM


Its quite interesting that Jefferson gave God the Glory for the Bill of Rights!
Jar, I'm not to crazy about religion, and neither were our Christian founding fathers, was not this was the purpose of the Constitution, so one could worship God without the government interfering with the free exercise thereof, its known that its not separation of the Church from being involved in government, but the separation of the government from christian churches, when Jefferson said that God is the author of those rights, he was not speaking to any particular christian church, but to all Christians that were responsible for the Constitution, that he was proclaiming to the world that God is the author of our bill of rights(giving God the glory), to protect churches, from the threat of government turning on them, and their freedoms, for churches to beable to be involved in the government , and be protected from the government(Jeffersons stating enjoy a separation protection from government interference), etc...
P.S. It quite obvious that Jefferson was talking about the Christian religions(all the different christian denominations that fled religious persecution for their belief in Christ and not in the doctrines of the Government sponsored church), religion was never intended to include the occult sects (Hindu, buddist, muslims, and other satanic sects that don't believe in God), interestingly if one followed the constitution with Jeffersons inference to the world the rights are from God, one could possibly exclude these rights to cults not of the Christian flavors, cause like Jefferson said our rights are from God (not from budda, hindu, allah, satan, but our rights are from God, and he announced this proclamation to the entire pagan world, that God is the author of the bill of rights, so that their pagan beliefs would not be confused with their pagan gods getting the glory, the credit, etc...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 362 by jar, posted 08-28-2004 8:06 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 369 by jar, posted 08-28-2004 9:38 PM johnfolton has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 369 of 612 (137747)
08-28-2004 9:38 PM
Reply to: Message 368 by johnfolton
08-28-2004 9:13 PM


Re: Its quite interesting that Jefferson gave God the Glory for the Bill of Rights!
whatever
You don't have a clue what you are talking about. And guess what

Once Again,You're Wrong!!!

It quite obvious that Jefferson was talking about the Christian religions(
Bullshit.
Here is what he thought of Christianity.
"But a short time elapsed after the death of the great reformer of the Jewish religion, before his principles were departed from by those who professed to be his special servants, and perverted into an engine for enslaving mankind, and aggrandizing their oppressors in Church and State." --Thomas Jefferson to Samuel Kercheval, 1810. ME 12:345
whatever writes:
religion was never intended to include the occult sects (Hindu, buddist, muslims, and other satanic sects that don't believe in God),
Actually, once again you are simply showing you don't know what you're talking about.
Here is what TJ had to say about Infidels, Hindus, Muslims and Buddhists.
"[When] the [Virginia] bill for establishing religious freedom... was finally passed,... a singular proposition proved that its protection of opinion was meant to be universal. Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word "Jesus Christ," so that it should read "a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion." The insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend within the mantle of its protection the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo and infidel of every denomination." --Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:67
Do you ever bother to check on any of the stupid assertions you make or do you just enjoy being proven wrong every time you make a post?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 368 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 9:13 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 371 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 10:17 PM jar has replied

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5621 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 370 of 612 (137748)
08-28-2004 9:38 PM
Reply to: Message 366 by nator
08-28-2004 8:59 PM


No, I'm quite poor financially, thats why I'm voting for George, its called job creation, verses jobs fleeing for safer harbors, look at california, with their high cost for water, electricity, and the industries fleeing california, because of the democrats environmental laws, etc...the people in frustration finally got rid of the democrat governor, and Arnolds having to resort to calling the democrats girlie men, just to get their attention, and the democrats were offended but the people cheered cause of the democrats being the reason for their high utility costs, and bankrupting the great state of california, we don't need a democratic presidency to raise taxes and increase America bankruptcy, etc...
P.S. I see no basis for democrats preventing electric power plants construction, other than they are being controlled by special interests, like the environmentalists, that are not in favor of building new oil refineries, power plants, or allowing the drilling for our own oil in our own country, etc...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 366 by nator, posted 08-28-2004 8:59 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 392 by nator, posted 08-29-2004 9:27 AM johnfolton has not replied
 Message 398 by crashfrog, posted 08-29-2004 1:38 PM johnfolton has not replied

johnfolton 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5621 days)
Posts: 2024
Joined: 12-04-2005


Message 371 of 612 (137752)
08-28-2004 10:17 PM
Reply to: Message 369 by jar
08-28-2004 9:38 PM


Re: Its quite interesting that Jefferson gave God the Glory for the Bill of Rights!
Jar, I think your talking about the Virginia State constitution, not the US constitution ?, wasn't aware the TJ signed the US Constitution, or played a part with the Bill of Rights, thought he was the governor of Virginia, so he never crafted the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, just announcing to the world the founding fathers not even taking the glory of the crafting of the Bill of Rights but that God was the Author of the Bill of Rights. Thomas Jefferson incorrectly interpreted this to include pagan religions in the Virgina constitution, its quite interesting how quickly the Virginia constitution got subverted, to the inclusions of occults, and infidels, that clearly are not of the Christian flavors, etc...
P.S. Your kind of saying that Jefferson had his own interpretation of the scriptures, so might of been sliding down the slippery slope, in regards to the Virginia Constitution, like did they consult the founding fathers of the Bill of Rights what they regarded as a religion?, etc...
Its interesting, but true that the bill of rights were authored by God, taken from Christian bible, its not right to take credit for someone else authorship(is it), even here at EVC(right), and Credit was given to (God)for from where they drew up the Bill of Rights, that TJ announced to the whole world that the Christian God the credit for authorship, cause they drew from the Christian bible(no different than giving credit to a link here at EVC), this all proves that our founding fathers were Christians deeply involved in the founding of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, TJ probably was being a bit sarcastic in announcing to the whole world, but even so, God was given the credit, cause it was taken from the bible, etc...
Chuck Baldwin -- Bible Inspired America's Founding Documents
BIBLE INSPIRED AMERICA'S FOUNDING DOCUMENTS
By Pastor Chuck Baldwin
May 30, 2003
NewsWithViews.com
This message has been edited by whatever, 08-28-2004 09:52 PM
This message has been edited by whatever, 08-28-2004 09:55 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 369 by jar, posted 08-28-2004 9:38 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 372 by jar, posted 08-28-2004 10:36 PM johnfolton has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 372 of 612 (137753)
08-28-2004 10:36 PM
Reply to: Message 371 by johnfolton
08-28-2004 10:17 PM


Re: Its quite interesting that Jefferson gave God the Glory for the Bill of Rights!
WOW!
Can you believe it, whatever doesn't know what he's talking about.
Surprise.
whatever writes:
wasn't aware the TJ signed the US Constitution,...
The US Constiution was ratified, not signed.
whatever writes:
...or played a part with the Bill of Rights,...so he never crafted the Constitution or the Bill of Rights,
The US Constitution was based in a large part on the Virgina Constitution and the Bill of Rights was most definitely the product of the three great Virginia delegates.
The Virginia Constitution Pre-dated the US Constitution and even the US Declaration of Independance.
So what he wrote in regard to the Virginia Constitution was before he wrote the draft of the US Declaration of Independance and when he metioned GOD there he most certainly meant those Pagan Gods as well.
No wonder you support Bush. You know as little about US history as he does.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 371 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 10:17 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 374 by RAZD, posted 08-28-2004 10:56 PM jar has not replied
 Message 376 by johnfolton, posted 08-28-2004 11:00 PM jar has replied

Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 373 of 612 (137756)
08-28-2004 10:56 PM
Reply to: Message 365 by RAZD
08-28-2004 8:52 PM


Re: Jefferson was referring to the bill of rights
Oh, don't worry about me giving anything away. I doubt that whatever actually reads the responses he gets. Or if he does, and it goes against his prior beliefs he doesn't seem to understand it and skips over it.
But, by the gods, I enjoy his posts!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 365 by RAZD, posted 08-28-2004 8:52 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 375 by RAZD, posted 08-28-2004 10:57 PM Chiroptera has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 374 of 612 (137757)
08-28-2004 10:56 PM
Reply to: Message 372 by jar
08-28-2004 10:36 PM


Re: Its quite interesting that Jefferson gave God the Glory for the Bill of Rights!
Pagan?
Deism - Wikipedia
Deism is belief in a God or first cause based on reason rather than faith
a list of deists:
List of deists - Wikipedia
This is a partial list of believers in deism the belief in a God based on natural religion only, or belief in religious truths discovered by people through a process of reasoning, independent of any divine revelation through scripture or personal relevation. They have been selected for their influence on that religion, or for their fame in other areas.
* Denis Diderot
* Benjamin Franklin
* William Hogarth
* David Hume
* Thomas Jefferson
* Gotthold Ephraim Lessing
* John Locke
* James Madison
* Thomas Paine
* Baruch Spinoza
* Matthew Tindal
* John Toland
* Voltaire
* George Washington
meanwhile
Paganism - Wikipedia
Paganism (or "Heathenism") is a catch-all term which has come to bundle together (by extension from its original classical meaning of a non-Christian religion) a very broad set of not necessarily compatible religious beliefs and practices that are usually, but not necessarily, characterized by polytheism and, less commonly, animism.
If Deism is paganism then all religions are paganism
sheesh
whatever is blowing smoke in one ear and out the other.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 372 by jar, posted 08-28-2004 10:36 PM jar has not replied

RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 375 of 612 (137758)
08-28-2004 10:57 PM
Reply to: Message 373 by Chiroptera
08-28-2004 10:56 PM


Re: Jefferson was referring to the bill of rights
he should enter the "Last Comic Standing" contest.
{added}:
ps -- he did get it wrong. very wrong. whatever wrong.
heh.
This message has been edited by RAZD, 08-28-2004 10:00 PM

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 373 by Chiroptera, posted 08-28-2004 10:56 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024